Dismissed
The Executive Engineer, Randb Division, and Another v. Jangaiah, and 2 Others
Telangana HCWP/23577/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special…
What the court decided
AI extract
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
wRtT PET|TION NO. 23577 0F 200S
Between:
AND
...RES'ONDENTS
PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybepleased toissueanappropriatewritordirectionmoreparticularlyoneinthenatureof,'Writof Ce(iorari,'callingfortherecordsconnectedwiththeorderdated24.l0.2008in l,D.No.87of 2007 on the file of Labour Court-lll AP 'Hyderabad to quash thesame as erroneousand contrarY to law'
WPMP. NO:30628 OF 20092009
WPMP. NO:30628 OF 20092009 Petition undersectttn151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled in supportof the petition' the High Court may be pleasedto suspendthe operationof the orders dated24'10'2008in lD'No 87/2007 on the file ofLabourcourt-lll,A.P.,Hyderabadpendingdisposalofthewritpetition' WPMP' NO:47174 OF 2017
Between:
FUo.D.No.29-62/1 ,Farooqnagar(v) & (M)' A. Radhika,W/o. Late A' Jangaiah' MahaboobnagarDistrict'
...PETITIONER/PROPOSEDRESP'NO'4
AND
District
2
...RES,.NDENTS/RES'.NDENTS
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to bring the Petitioner A.Radhika on record as 4th Respondent as she is the L.R. of the 1't Respondent in W.P.No.23577 of 2009.
Counsel for the Petitioners: GP FOR ROADS & BUILDINGS
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 and Proposed Respondent:
SRI M. VIJAY KUMAR GOUD
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3: Gp FOR LABOUR
The Court made the following: ORDER
rHE HON'BLE SRI JIIS?ICE ABHINAND KIIMAR SHAVILI
WRII PEilTtON No.2 77 of 2009
ORDER:
Todoy though the moiier is listed under the coplion 'for dismissol', none oppeored for the petiiioners.
A perusol of the record discloses thot lhere wos no representotion for the petitioners on 27 .09.2021 ond therefore, ihe motter wos directed 1o be listed todoy under the coption 'for dismissol'. Todoy olso, lhere is no represeniolion for the petitioners though lhe motter is listed under the coplion 'for dismissol'. This Court hos no other opiion except to dismiss the cose for defoult.
Accordingly, the wril peiition is dismissed for defoult ond for
non-prosecuiion. No cosls.
Pending miscelloneous pe'titions, if ony, sholl stond closed.
SD/- K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I //TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. Two CCs to GPfor Roadsand Buildings,Highcourt for the state of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0411012021
ORDER
WP.No.23577 of 2009
a6E srAr6,
^+
Aa
'i,}
o 02 Nov28?l .:,
t /
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR DEFAULT AND FOR NON.PROSEGUTION WITHOUT COSTS,
$7 ,.rr\rD \9
The Executive Engineer, (R & B) Division, Kalwakurthy, Mahabubnagar District
The Superintending Engineer, (R & B) Circle, Mahabubnagar
Jangaiah
The Presiding officer, The Labour Court No.11, Hyderabad
The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Joint Secretary
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court