This defect was found; however, the orders made by this Court have been found complied with. The contempt case is accordingly closed, subject to the right of the petitioners to challenge the subsequent rejection order.
Contempt case closed and other petitions stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAYOF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTYONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
CONTEMPT CASENO: 940 OF 2021
contempt filed undersections10 1o 12 of contempt of courtsAct 1971to punish the Respondents herein, forwill full violation and deliberate disobedience of the orders Dated 06.04.202'1in W.P. No.4391of 2021
Between:
AND
..... RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioners:SRl. POODATTU AMARENDER
Counsel for the Respondents:G.P. FORSERVICEll
The Court made the following:ORDER
I
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMARSHAVILI
CONTEMPT CAS No.940 of 2021
ORDER:
When the motter is loken up for heoring, Government Pleoder oppeoring for the respondents hos informed the Courl thot pursuont to the orders possed by this Court, the cose of the pelltioners wos considered ond rejecled vide proceedings doled 49.07 .2021 .
Miscelloneous petitions, if ony, pending, sholl stond closed.
sD/-c.v.M,ALLrfflir#t VARMA ISTRAR
\
,TRUECOPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
4 Sri. R.V. Karnan,l.A.S, R One CC toSri Poodattu 6 iwo CCs toG.P. for Se i,[Ir",lftl*I"""r1t:,t?trYf;t]eotretansana,'t HYderabad [OUTI
HIGH COURT
DATED:0111012021
-iAI'q
I
21 0fi2021 C,
,),l
+
ORDER
CC.No.940of 2021
CLOSINGTHE CONTEMPT CASE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt case is closed as the government orders were complied with under the Court's earlier direction.
Whether the rejection order dated 09.07.2021 can be challenged for jurisdictional defects.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Narayana
T. Venu
G. Srinivasa Rao
Sved Ali Murtuza Rizvi
Dr. Juveria
R. V. Karnan
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
