Petitioner challenged railroad license renewal; court dismissed writ as infructuous upon counsel submission.
None; petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
IVIONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO: 13859 OF 2021
Between:
K. Padmaja, Wife of Jaya Reddy, Aged about 56 years, Resident of Malkajgiri, Secunderabad
...PETITIONER
AND
.,.RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lvlandamus, directing the respondents 2 and 3 to extend the license period of the contract of the petitioner for running A/C Waiting Hall on P.F.NoS.1 and 10 of Secunderabad Railway Station, for a period of I months and'l '1 days, as per the guidelines dated 0810212021 , issued by the Railway Department, declaring the in action of the respondent Nos.2 and 3 on the representation of the petitioner dated 15/06/2021 tor extension of her license period is highly unjust, arbitrary, contrary to the guidelines issued by the Railway Department, illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos.2 and 3 topermit thepetitioner to operate her A/C Waiting Hall on P.F.NoS.1 and 10 of Secunderabad Railway Station, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. C. RAMACHANDRA RAJU Counsel for the Respondents: SRI T. S. VENKATARAMANA
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION No.13859 of 2O2l
ORDER:
When the molter is token up for heoring, leorned counsel oppeoring for the petitioner hod coniended thot the couse in the wril pelition does not survive for odludicotion ond hos become infrucluous.
Recording the sold submission, lhe writ petilion is dismissed os
infructuous. No cosls.
Pending miscelloneous petitions, if ony, sholl stond closed.
SD/.I.NAGALAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ /-'- 1l ) SECTIOI'I OFFICER
To,
'1 . One CC to Sri C. Ramachandra Raju, Advocate [OPUC]
Snl
)
HIGH COURT
DATED:0411012021
ORDER
WP.No.13859 of 2021
x-)' "),_l
,z
c , 7 0qTic?I
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS
Lo ?n<br>
K. Padmaja
South Central Railway
General Manager, Indian Railway Stations Development Corporation Ltd.
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
