The Telangana High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by landowners challenging interference with construction work by the State. Relying on written instructions stating the police treated the matter as civil, the Court closed the writ petition without costs.
The writ petition is closed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 23252 OF 2021
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of theconstitutionof lndia praylng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaringthe action of the RespondentsNot to 4 in interfering construction work of buildingand possessionof land in Plot No.31 (Part) with an extent of'l 35.66 Sq.yards, inSy.No.11,situated at GopalpurVillage' Hanamakonda Mandal, warangalUrban District(old) Hanamakonda District(New) belongs to Petitioners withoutany reason or cause, without following due process of law, is illegal, arbitrary and violation offundamentalrights guaranteed under Articles 14, 21 and 300-4 of the Constitutionof lndia.
A NO: 1 OF 202
Petition under section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondent to not to interfereconstructionwork of building including my possessibn of land in Plot No.31 (Part) with extent135.66 Sq. yards situatedat bopalpur Village, HanamakondaMandal, Warangal District(Old),Hanamakonda Disirict (New) belong to thePetitioners,in pending disposal of writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners:SRl, HARI PRASAD PODILA
Counsel forthe RespondentNos. 1 to 4: SRl. S. RAM MOHAN,AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the RespondentNos. 5 & 6: NONEAPPEARED The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.23252 OF 2O2L
ORDER
Sri S.Ram Mohan, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, u,ould submit that he received written instructions from the 4s respondent herein- the Sub Inspector of Police, Kakatiya University Campus Police Station.
shall stand closed in the light of this Iinal order.
SD/. M. MANJULA I.SSI:JTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// G SE CTION OFFICER
To, 1 . One CC to Sri. Podila Hari Prasad, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies 4. One Spare Copy PN,,I TP {
HIGH COURT
DATED:2210912021
ORDER
'i $E STA r4r
C
i)t)J 1$ 0fi2{H
J<br>:/
\ 'r- ,.- ^ ?'
.',]:
-;i/
WP.No.23252 of 2021
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging interference with construction work and possession of land should be closed.
Whether the High Court is required to interfere in the case as it is declared civil in nature by police.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Poloju Vikram
Thaduri Ashwini
State of Telangana
Commissioner of Police, Warangal
Assistant Commissioner of Police, Hanamakonda
Surekha Khashikar
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
