Petitioners sought writ under Article 226 regarding illegal construction permissions. Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed writ petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw writ petition accorded; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original J urisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION N o.12448 0F 2021
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent authorities in not taking any action against the respondent no. 6 and 7 with regard to the illegal permission and sanction plan granted for construction of building in Greenbelt area open layout, in Sy.No.59/1 , situated atBapu Nagar, S.R. NagarColony, T.S. No.35/3,3S/2, Block No.E, ward No.7, Yusufguda, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutio na I and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to cancel the building permission and sanction plan granted infavour of the respondent no.6 and 7 vide permit No. 1 4694/D/c/c2/2020 with Ref file No. 3/cc1 0 I 1 1 s7 o t2o1 7 dt. 22t 1 2t2o2o. IANO: 1OF2 021
Petltion under section 15i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the
respondent no. 6 and 7 not to proceed any further construction in Greenbelt area open layout, in Sy.No. 59/1 , situated at Bapu Nagar, S.R. Nagar Colony, T.S. No. 3513, 3512, Block No.E, Ward No.7, Yusufguda, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. VENKATESWARLU SANISETTY
Counsel for the Respondent No 1: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMIN|STRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4: SRI N. ASHOK KUMAR, S.C. FOR GHMC
Counsel for the Respondent No.s: SRI C. BUCHI REDDY,
S.C. FOR TELANGANA STATE HOUSING CORPORATION
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI MANDAPATI MURALI KRTSHNA
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHM,A,N
WRIT PE TITION No.1244 8 0F 2021
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this
Court to withdraw the writ petition.
No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall
stand dismissed.
\
To,
SD/-V.SUDHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' (U)/" SECTION OFFICER
s b-ne-ct to Sril\rlandapati [\ilurali Krishna, Advocate (OPUC)
VIP EJ
HIGH COURT
DATED:2210912021
ORDER
flf {i 14
,
J*
.J
1s ocTz0zt
a
WP.No.12448 ot 2021
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
C. Kishan Singh Rathod
Raja Singh Ghugloth
State of Telangana
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
