Petitioner sought a writ of Mandamus directing TSGenco to implement a 2018 court order and grant him artisan benefits. The single judge dismissed the petition as not maintainable due to a pending Division Bench status quo order prohibiting implementation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THESTATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THESECOND DAY OF SEPTEIVBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLESRIJUSTICEB'VIJAYSENREDDY
WRIT PETITIONNO. 20915 oF 2021
Between:
Shaik MahaboobAli, S/o'SKSaidamiya' Contract Labour'Aoed about 46Years mo.H.r.ro s-,'138t2,ooorgJ;e;'i?w Fjror''a'nidradrixolnag:gET,P6'[ig
AND t. The TS GENCO,Rep.by its Chairmanand Managing Director'Vidyut Soudha' 2. ?if '[],:lti'tfilitf $t30eK3o' viov't Soudha'SomaiisudaKhairathabad 3 ?X!tli&1;?'&"3'rcts),rS GENC.Vidvut Soudha' Somaiisuda'Hvderabad- 500082 Ir'4 r' Rep byrts Chref 4 The Kothaqudemt nermal Power Station IO 'l-d Fnoineer,(O andlr'4iPalon'ch'' "eiionidiixo^thasug,emDistrict- 507 1 15 5 rh; Kothaqudemrnermai'p?*i. si;ii"; t !1a.o"e v and Vl 1 Rep bv its chtet e"Ell,iJl.;F;il,;;na.anaohaoikot'isuoems;51iict- s07115 ...RESpoNoENrs
PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstancesstated in the affidavit filedtherewith' the High Court may be pleased to issuean orderor direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaringthe action of the respondentsin not implementingthe order dated 3/10/2018passedin wp. No. 4172iof 2017 passed by this Hon'ble courtas illegal arbitrary,discriminatlvebesidesviolationArticleal4'l6and2loftheConstitutionof lndia andConsequentlydirect the respondentsto implementthe abovesaid order and absorbthe petitioneras artisan or in any suitabre post in the. TSGENCoand grant all benefitsto the post attachedArtisan'
A NO: Petition 10F2021unde r Section151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct implementthe order dated 3/10/2018 passedin WP No'41 721 the respondentsto ol 2017 PendingdisPosalof W P'
Counselfor the Petitioner:SRI G' ALLABAKASH
*tELFoR counserfor the Respondents : sRr " !ff Ii-:tBi$it{h?ou
The Courtmadethe following:ORDER
THE H()N'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
\IIRIT PETITION No.2O915 of 2021
ORDER:
SD/-K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REqISTBAR //TRUE COPY// .tL,-SECTION OFFICER
I
To,
T/P
*-_-
HIGHCOURT
DATED:02/09/20:;ll
ORDER
5TA rt- Qr
( *
t
(.';
iJ 24 $?$11 <<br>!-
'," ,9 c +
+-
-..i-:-::,_-- ;72
WP.No.20915ctf 2021
DISMISSING'THEWRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS,
N,,
7<br>a'L \ or
d
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition requesting implementation of a previous order is maintainable in the presence of a forceful pending status quo order.
Whether the High Court should declare the respondents' non-implementation of the imputed order arbitrary and violative of constitutional provisions.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shaik Mahaboob Ali
The TS GENCO
B. Vijaysen Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
