Petition under Article 226 oflhe constitution of lndiapra'ring that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed therewith, the Highcourt m;ry be pleased to issue a writ or order,moreparticularlywrit of Mandamus der;laring that the petitioners are entitled to for appointmentto any one of the Juniorr\ssistant/ Junior Assistant/ office Subord inate/Lascarsetc.,or any other equivalent categoryof posts to the extent of 50Percentof vacancies earmarked as per G O'lvls NO 98 dt.15/04/1986 and alsounder Physically handicapped quota mealt for displaced persons quota in any one of theexisting vacancies if necessrry by creating supernumeraryposts underSriramsagar project and Lower lvlanair[)am by including his name in the displacedpersons list from time to timeas per thtr conditionsand norms mentioned in variousviz., G O., 34 dl20lo2l20og 'G.O.[l]sNo 45 dt.O4lo7t2O12 R/w G.O.lr,4s.NO.68dt.17105/2014 and G.O.Ms.No45I and CAD dt.28l12l2)2} including the ordersof the HonourableTribunal in o A. No.8208/2003 and batch dt.06/05/2004 and o.A.No.791712003and as per judgment High court in W.P.No.2346/2011 dt.O8tO2t2O11Apex Court judgmentin S.L F'.No.1430512011 dt.o4to7l2o11 as the Awards areprior to issuanceof G.o.lvls.No.(18 dt.15/04/1986 and alsojudgment in w.P.No.4164of 2019 and balch d.0110712021andconsequently hotd the action of the respondents in denyingemployment to themu rder the scheme on one reason or the other includingtechnicalreasonsthat applicati,rn has not made within time even suchgrounds are examinedand considered in the above said judgments of this Honourable court and Apex court despite of availability of existing vacancies vide Proc No. ES/GV/.4/Applications/Vol.XV/M/570dt.11/0{)/2019 issued by the 4th respondents despite filing representations,and filing O,As., is illegal, Arbitrary, discriminatory, unjust and contrary tothe dicta laid down b'r the Honourable Courts and violation of Articles 14and21 of the Constitution of lndia
