A writ petition seeking declaration of illegal appointment process and fairness in Additional Public Prosecutor selection was disposed of as not pressed by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRI T PET|T|ON NO. 2069 0F 2021
Between:
Yerra Kameswar, S/o. Nagaraju, Aged41 years, Occ. Advocate,Rl/o D.No.9-2-38, tr/athura Basthi, Kothasudem, ahadradri KothagudemDistrict, Telangr.i..UfJiPi,Or
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or directionmore in the nature of lVlandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 in initiatingthe process for appointment of Additional Public Prosecutor for theproposed POCSOCourt at Kothagudem duringpeak covlD-19pandamic situation therebynot providing fair opportunityto all the candidates eligible for appointmentas AdditionalPublic Prosecutoras illegal, arbitrary offending Ar1. 14 ofthe Constitutionof lndia and consequentiallyto direct the respondents toprovidefair opportunityto the petitionerand other similarly situatedpersons by receiving applicationsfor appointmentto the post of Additional Public Prosecutor for theproposed POCSOCourt at Kothagudem.
lA NO: 1 OF 1 Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support ofthe petition, the HighCourt may be pleasedto stay all furtherproceedings in the matterof appointmentof Additional Public Prosecutor for the proposed Pocso court atKothagudem, pending disposalof the above writ petition.
Gounsel for the Petitioner:SRI M. SUDHEER KUMAR
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 &2: GP FOR LAW AND
LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
Counsel for the RespondentNo.3: -
The Court made the following:ORDER
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF' JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
AND
THE ON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN DDY
WRTT PETITTO NNo.2069 of 2021
ORDER: (Per the Hon'bte the Chief Justice Hima Koh-ti)
1 . After addressing arguments for some time, learned counsel for
the petitioner states that he does not wish to press the present petition. 2. The present petition is accordingly disposed of as not pressed
along with the pending applications, if any.
SD/.K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' k/'
SECTION OFFICER
To,
MP
".-
HIGH COURT
DATED:0310212021
ORDER
WP.No.2O69 of 2021
.fA
-i 5
/<br>/d
ii) 12 FEB 2021 az
2
.A t
D
)4
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AS NOT PRESSED WITHOUT COSTS
*$pi.l )vtt*"-F
Yerra Kameswar
The State of Telangana
Hima Kohli
B.Vijaysen Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
