Disposed

Kaleemullah Khan and 2 others v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Telangana HC3 Feb 2021WA/33/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a Writ Appeal and pending interim applications concurrently, confirming an order maintaining status quo regarding land and directing the Single Judge to decide the underlying writ petition expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

Disposed of the writ appeal along with pending applications confirming status quo; directed Single Judge to decide underlying writ petition within three months.

Kaleemullah Khan and 2 others Vs The… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶5

WRIT APPEAL NO: 33 0F 2020

¶6

writ Appeal Under clause 15 of the Letters patent Appeal preferred against the order Dated: 09-12-2019 in tA. Nos. 1&2 ot 2oi7 (wvtMp. No. 2517 & s187 of 2oi7) in WPMP. No. 20332/2016 in WP. No.^'16469 of 2016 on the file of the High Court.

¶7

Betwee n:

¶8

'1 . Kaleemuliah Khan, S/o. Late Fathe Ullah Khan Aged about 69 years, Occ.Business, R/o. H. No.'1 6-2 -1 45 I A17 I 2, Ir.4a lakpet, Hyde-ra baO

¶9

It4ohd. Naveed urrah Khan, s/o. Kaleemulah Khan, Aqed about 32 vears. Occ.Business, R/o. H. No. 1 6-2 -1 4Sl A17 12, Malakpet, UfOerEOaO

¶10

It4ohd. It/laaz Ullah Khan, S/o. Kaleemulah Khan, Aged about 30 vears, Occ. B usiness, Fl/o. H. No.'1 6-2 - 1 45 I Al7 12, Irrlalakpet, t-.lyOer; naO

¶11

...Appellants/ Writ^petitioners

¶12

AND

¶13

1 The State of Telangana, f.eO bV its principal Secretary. Revenue Assignment (l) Department. Secretarrat. Hyderabad.

¶14

2 Telangana State lndustrial lnfrastructure Corporation Limited, Rep. by its Vice Cha.irman and I,4anaging Director. 5-9-58/8. Parishrama Bhavan,'g,' Floor, Basheerbagh. Hyderabad-500 004.

¶15

3 The Special Officer and Compelent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling Authority, Chandra Vihar, 3rd Floor, l,4.J. Road, Hyderabad,

¶16

4 Syed_Aneesudd in, S/o. Late.S-y{j Habeebuddin, Aged about 58 years, Occ.Business, R/o. H.No.B-1-297l2lcl7 , Falcon Vaiiey, Shaikpet, Hyderabad.

¶17

... Respondents/ Respondents

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶19

Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the Order dated: 0911212019 passed in l.A.Nos.^.l and 2 of 2017 in WPMP.No,2033212016 in W.P.No.16469 of 2016, pending disposat of the writ appeal.

¶20

lA NO: 2 OF 2020

¶21

Between:

¶22

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Assignment (l) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶23

2 The Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling Authority, Chandra Vihar, 3rd Floor, IVl.J. Road, Hyderbbad.

¶24

... Petitioners/ Respondents

AND

Contd...

Kaleemullah Khan,^{S/o. Late Fathe Ullah Khan Aged about 69 years,} Occ. Business, R/o.^{H.No. 1 6-2 -1 451 A17 12' [r/alakpet, Hyderabad}

¶30

Ivlohd. Naveed Ullah^{Khan, S/o.Kaleemulah Khan,Aged about 32 years.} Occ.Business, Rio. H.No.^{1 6-2-1 45 1 A17 12, l,4alakpet,Hyderabad}

¶31

tr/ohd. lr/aaz Ullah Khan, S/o.^{KaleemulahKhan,Aged about 30 years,} Occ. Business, R/o.^{H. No.'16-2 -1 45 I Al7 12,[,4alakpet,Hyderabad}

¶32

... Respondents / APPellants

¶33

4 Telangana State lndustrial^I nfrastructure Corporation^{Limited,Rep.,Py-} its Vice Chairiran and t.4anaging Director,5-9-58/8,^{Parishrama Bhavan, B" F} loor, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad-500 004.

¶34

Sved Aneesuddin. S/o. Late. Syed^{Habeebuddin. Aged about 58 years} Occ.Business, R/o. H.No.B-1^{-297 l2l0t7.FalconValley. Shaikpet,Hyderabad}

¶35

...Respondents/ Respondents

¶36

Petition under Section^'151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the} affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Court maybe pleasedto vacate} orders in l.A. No. 1 ol 2020 in^{WA. No. 33 ot 2020 dated: 08.01.2020 and also} dismiss the Writ Appeal as not maintainable.

¶37

Counsel forthe Appellants: SRI K. RAMAKANTH^REDDY

¶38

Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.¹ & 3:^{ADVOCATE GENERAL}

¶39

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI^{L. PRABHAKARREDDY}

¶40

Counsel for the Respondent No.4:^{M.M. FIRDOS}

¶41

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶42

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

¶43

AND

¶44

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY

¶45

WRIT APPEAL No.33 of 2020

¶46

JUDGMENT: @er the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Hima Kohli)

¶47

With the consent of the parties, the present appeal is disposed of along with the pending applications, if any, while confirming the interim order dated 08.01.2020 directing status quo to be maintained by the parties in respect of the subject land, with a request to the leamed Single Judge to hear and decide W.P.No.16469 of 2016, wherein pleadings are complete, as expeditiously as possible,

¶48

preferabl,v r,,,ithin three months fi om toduy.

¶49

SD/- C.V.MALLIKARJUNA^VARMA DEPUTY REGISTRAR //rRUE COPY/I qp

SECTION OFFICER

To,

'1 . One CC to Sri. K. Ramakanth Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]

¶54

One CC to Ir/,|M. Firdos,^Advocate [OPUC]

¶55

One C.C. to Sri. L.^{Prabhakar Reddy,Advocate (OPUC)}

¶56

Two CCs to Advocate^{General, High Court for the State of Telangana} IouT]

¶57

Two C.D. Copies

Prk

HIGH COURT

DArED:0310212021

H TA 14:
(
,a(
c,J 22 ttB 2021
c<br>c

ORDER

WA.No.33 ot 2020

Disposing of the WA.

U
)n)y'
1

Kaleemullah Khan and 2 others v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kaleemullah Khan and 2 others v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Appala , Akula Chandramma Vs The State of Telangana

The Kakatiya Urban Development Authority Rep by its Vice Chairman Hanamkonda, Vs M/s. G. Vikas Reddy and Co.

Ayush Agarwal Vs The State of Telangana and 5 others

Venkateswara Rao Jammu Vs The Govt. of India and 3 others

Smt T a D Soujanya Vs R Dasarath Goud

Yerra Kameswar Vs The State of Telangana