The High Court disposed of the Writ Appeal and Writ Petition No. 8955 of 2019 filed by a resident challenging illegal construction, holding that the appeal was unnecessary as the underlying writ petition was already pending with the learned single judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT APPEAL NO: 38 OF 202 0& wP NO.89550F 2019
wA NO.38 0 F 2Q2O:
Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the LettersPatent preferredagainst the Order dated 1011212019passed in W P No 26697of 2019 on the file of the High Court.
Between:
Z. iV S"Giiatfrii, Wlo S Sreekanth {geO_SaYears Occ HousewifeR/o Plot Nos - 616, 617', 634, 635, Type B Sri Ramnagar, 40 Ft Road, Kondapur, serilingampally tvandal 500084 ...A''ELLANTS/RES'.NENTNo.6& 7
AND
IA NO :1 OF 2020
Petition under Section'151 CPC praying thatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the High court may be pleasedto suspend the operation of thelearned single judgein w.P.No. 26697 of 2019 dated10-12-2019
lA NO: 3 oF 2020
Petition under Section148 ofWritRules R/w. 151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavitfiled in supportof the petition,the HighCourt maybepleasedtoextendthestayofimpugnedorderDt'1011212019inW.P.No. 26697 of 2019 tilldisposal of the Writ Appeal
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section151CPC prayingthatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto pass appropriateordersbyextendingtheinterimordersuntilfurtherordersinl.A.No-1of 2020 in W.A. No.38 of 2020 Dated 1210212020
)
lA NO: 2 OF 2020:
Between:
R Dasarath Goud, S/o R Anjaiah Aged 40 years Occ Business Rl/o Plot No 64 Masjidbanda Kondapur, Serilinsampally R R District.HX??l?P"1o.R?*org.rtJr?Nr
No. 1
AND
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Vacate W.A.l.A.No. 1 of 2020 in W. A. No. 38 of 2020 daled 1010112020, in the interest of justice
IA NO 4 0F 2020
Between:
AND
T A D Soujanya, D/o. Late Sri T. V. Ratnakara Raju W/o M Amarnath Aged 38 years Occ House wife Fl/o H.No.6-103/527, Gulmohar Park colony, Serilingampally, Medchal Malkajgiri District.
S'ONDENTS Petition under Section 340 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to cause an enquiry in the above matter and after enquiry make a complaint against the Respondent No.1 for forging the Petitioner's signature and also for filing the above Writ Appeal without her authorization and consent
Counsel forthe Appellant No. 1: SRI ANGOTHU NEHRU
.,-9'
Counsel for the Appellant No. 2: SRICH LAXMI NARAYANA
Counsel for Respondent No.1: SRIK. GOPAL
Counsel for Respondent No.2: GPFORMUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION& URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for RespondentNos.3 to 6: SRI SAMPATHPRABHAKARREDDY
WP NO: 8955 OF 2019
Between:
R.DasarathGoud,S/oR.Aniaiah,Aged40years,Occ-Business,R/oPlotNo' O+, trtiijioUanaa, Kondapur,Serilingimpally,-R.R.District,Hyderabad- 500 084' (T s)
AND
s. Sii1.n.ptao'eep iaiu,57o t.V.Ratnat<arRaju, Aged About 33.vears' occ - - Enoineer. R/o Fiat f.f6.'f OO' Java Bharathi Salar HTeights,Road No 3' 1st cro'ss, x.f. n. Colony,Nizampei,R. R District'500090
o. 5rt.i.A.o. sourarivi,W/o ffiArl;t";U, ngeo 36 y91p.o-c9-,J1911e-.y1re'nro Plot No.s 616,6i7,634,635Type B.Sri Ramnagar, 40 I-t Roao' Konoapur' SerilingamPallYMandal 500084
z. snli. ilV.ai o6vatnrililvioi.-d.Sreekanth, Ased32 Years'occ - Housewife' R/o' ' Fioi rtro.tlz lb,'ztt. )za.-zze rype B Sii R6mnagar, 40 Ft Road' Kondapur' SerilingampallyMandal 500084 ...RES',NDENTS
Petition underArticle 226 o1 lhe constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith'theHighCourtmaybepleased to issue a writ, orderor direction more particularlyone ln the natureof Writof MandamusdeclaringtheactionoftherespondentsNo.2and3hereininnottaking aCtionontherepresentation/complaintdated,16.04-20.lBSubmittedbythe petitioneragainstthe4thtoTthrespondentsWhocarriedoutillegalconstruction without obtainingany permission from the competent authorityin respectof the Plots No. 215(part), 216,217'228,22gand 230 (part)' Type-C' admeasuring878 sq yards in SurveyNo.200 and Plots No 616,617 '634' 635'Type-B' admeasuring 800 sqyards in Survey No. 204, in total extentof 1678Sq yards situatedat Sriram Nagar, Kondapur,Serlingampally,Hyderabad isbeingillegal' arbitrary' unreasonableandviolativeofconStitutionalmandatesguaranteedunderthe ConstitutionandcontrarytotheprovisionscontemplatedunderMunicipal CorporationActandRulesmadethereunderandconsequentlydirectthe3rd respondenttodemolishtheillega|constructionmadebythe4thtoTthrespondents without therebeing permission from the competent authority
Lt-
IA NO 1 0F 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents herein to consider the dispose of the representation / complaint dated 16-04-2018 made by the petition for illegal construction of respondents No.4 to 7 in respect of the Plots No.215 (part), 216, 217,228,229 and 230 (part), Type-C, admeasuring 878 sq yards in Survey No.200 and Plots No. 616,617,634,635, Type-B, admeasuring 800 sq yards in Survey No.204, in total extent of 1678 Sq.yards situated at Sri ram Nagar, Kondapur, Serli ngampa lly, Hyderabad pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT. J. SUMATHI
Counsel for Respondent No.'l: GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 & 3: SRI SAMPATH PRABHAKAR REDDY
Counsel for Respondent Nos. 4 & 5: SRI K. GOPAL
Counsel for Respondent Nos. 6 & 7: SRI D. MADHAVA RAO
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEFJUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT APPEAL No.38 of 2020 AND WRIT PETITION No.8955 of 2019
COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the llon'ble the Chief Justice Hima Kohli)
l. The appellants are aggrieved by an order dated 10.12.2019, passed by the leamed Single Judge disposing of W.P.No.26697 of 2019 filed by the respondent No.l/writ petitioner praying inter alia for directions to the Government authorities to demolish the illegal construction purportedly carried out by the appellants at plots No.616, 617,634 and 635, Type B, situated in Sriram Nagar, Kondapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
Page I of 2
W.A.No.38 OF 2020 & ll'.P.No.8955 OF 2019
suggestion.
the order dated 10.12.2019 passed in W.P.No.26697 of 2019 and, disposing of W.P.No.8955 of 2019 filed by rhe respondent No.l/writ petitioner and pending adjudication before the leamed single Judge, along with the pending applications, ifany.
SD/.CH.VENKATESWARULU DEPUTY REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// .\fi.
To,
SECTION OFFICER
L8. Qne QQto Sri AngothuNehru,Advociie iO-pUCf
10 . lwo ccs to GP For Municip_ar Administration & Urban Deveropment, High court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]
11 .Qn" 99 to Sri Sampalh prabnatir Reddy,, Advocate (OpUC)
12 .One CC to Sri K. Gooal. Advocate (OPLJ'C) 13.Qne QC to Sri D. Madhava Rao, Advocate ?OpUCt 14.TwoCCsto GP ForGeneral Administratiori- High-'Court forthe State of Telanoana. [OUTI
15 . Two CID Copies
MBC
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0310212021
1 H € s 14 r4r
oo 2 7 mn 2021
o
I
*
SPA.i c !-O
i;
COMMON JUDGMENT
WA NO: 38 OF 2020 & WPNO.8955OF 2019
DISPOSING OF THE WA& WP
WITHOUT COSTS
$
u
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the pending writ petition WP No. 8955 of 2019 should be disposed of instead of the appeal against WP No. 26697 of 2019
Smt T A D Soujanya
Smt T B V Gayathri
R Dasarath Goud
The State of Telangana
The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
Hima Kohli
B. Vijaysen Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
