The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous without considering the merits of the challenge regarding the non-consideration of the petitioner's representation.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
H'GH COURT FOR THE S] t"r";,.i615'35 l:h3j.|f,ffiAr HYDERABAD
I THURSDAY, THE TWENTV trIDAT N T; o iHb,{oEilJI [,S ?i,?fi y.:Eo c roB E R 'w
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRITP ETITI N .2 2 40 2021
Between:
trj;j:'.[,*il fr;j[-s^t""leo'rfl+^No202, Anallg Nr]av1m,prot No 34, sundar R;E;y,wi;'EIp'ffi !?Ah#X?l%!",fJ,lSmanasin$ei'rtn;','s",iE,i"i,."i" AND ...PET|T|ONER l The Authorized officer, canara Bank, ARM Branch, 2nd Froor, circre office Building, 3-5-879 'Ruby Houie',-Opt'Ofi"'^,in euarters, Himayath Nagar, ^Hyderabad - 500029, Teiangana.
Petition under Article 226.of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 2810712021 and granting a further extension of time to fully settle OTS dues to the respondent bank as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice and violation of Art.14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of lndia.
IA NO: 1 OF 202'l
Petition under Section 151 CPC pra.ying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the respondent No..3 to consider the representation of thepetitioner dated 2810712021 and not to initiate any further stepspending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI TRUPTHI AGARWAL
Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI MANAV GECIL THOMAS
The Court made the following: ORDER
HO].I,BLESRI.IUSTICE ABHINANDKUMAR SHAVILT
PE oNNo.20254 of 2021
ORDER:
Counselfor P:titionerhassubmitted that the writ petitionhas
becomeinfructuolLs'
Recordingthe,same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous'
No orderas to costs.
Pending misccllaneousapplications,if any, shailstand closed'
\
SD/.L.LAKSHMI BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /iTRUE COPY// '\-- SECTION t'FFICER
To, 1. One CC to Sri Truptli Agarwal, Advocate [OPUC]
MP
,/
HIGHCOURT
DATED:2111012021
ORDER
WP.No.20254of 2021
f l ELJ
o
<br>o, *<br>r o
!!)
s
5 t:
s(^. qq
CJ H c .t"l * ://
DISMISSING THE WRITPETITIONAS INFRUCTUOUS WTHOUT COSTS
5
t-.<br>
2 provisions across 2 enactments
The Authorized Officer, Canara Bank, ARM Branch, 2nd Floor, Circle Office Building, 3-5-879 Ruby House, Officers Quarters, Himayath Nagar, Hyderabad - 500029, T
The Branch Manager, Canara Bank Hitech Park Branch, 11 Floor, Canara Bank Building, Abids, Hyderabad, Telangana.
The Assistant General Manager, Canara Bank, ARM Branch, 3rd Floor, Circle Office Building, Secunderabad.
Abhinand Kumar Shavl
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
