The High Court of Telangana granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw a writ petition challenging the legality of an NRI quota fee demand and subsequently dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission was accorded to withdraw the writ petition, and the petition was dismissed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
wRtT PET|T|ON NO. 17886 0F 2021
Between:
Makthala Hemanth, S/o. Ramulu, Age about 21 yea$, Occu- MBBS Student, Chalmeda Anand Rao institute of medical Scien'ces, presently staying in the Student Hostel of Chalmeda Anand Rao institute' of Medical- SLiences, Bommakal, Karimnagar Dist.
...PET|TIONER AND
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus calling petitioners records from the respondents and thereby declaring the action of respondents more particularly the action of respondent No.2 in demanding NRI quota fee being illegal, arbitrary, violative of fundamental rights, principals of natural justice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents more particularly second respondent to issue Hall ticket and permit the Petitioner to attend practical and theoretical examinations started from 2gt7t2O21 of MBBS 3rd year pending disposal of main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. SURESH GOUD
Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: Gp FOR MEDICAL HEALTH AND
FAMILY WELFARE
counsel for the Respondent No.3: sRl A. PRABHTLKAR RAo, s.c. FoR KNRUHS
counsel for the Respondent No.4: M/s. puJrrHA GORANTLA, s.c. FoR M.c.r
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
aA
THE HOT OURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VTJAYSEN REDDY
W.P.No.l78 86 0F 202r
OITDER:
Leamet counsel fbr the petitioner seeks permission of this court
to withdraw tl e writ petition.
No costs.
ASSrsriR/itI="XHlI //TRUE COPY// TL
SECTION OFFICER
To,
One CC to Sri G. iuresh Goud, Advocate [OPUC] ,1 Two CCs to GP fr r Medical Health and Family Welfare, High Court for the State of Telangana at H derabad. [OUTI 3 One CC to Sri A. t rabhilkar Rao, S.C. for KNRUHS (OPUC) 4 One CC to M/s. Ptjitha Gorantla, S.C. for M.C.l (OPUC) E Two CD Copies. 6 One Spare Copy. MP BS
HIGH COURT
DATED:161121i021
ORDER
WP.No.17886r fi 2021
/:, ..rE s irr f5
\ lY.
n,: ln.it ?il9?
DISMISSING1'HE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WTHOUTCO STS
n
1 I
Makthala Hemanth
State of Telangana
Chalmeda Anand Rao Institute of Medical Sciences
Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences
National Medical Commission of India
B. Vijaysen Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
