The petitioner sought permission to withdraw a writ petition challenging the appointment process for a public prosecutor post. The court granted permission, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
Permission to withdraw the present writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
H'GH COURI FOR rHE SI oGo,6,I5,3j fffj!:,flf Ar HvDERABAD
TUESDAY,THE rwoilb'jsAii5T_,#r"Jr?gl?,.i.-
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
Between:
RIT P E TITIO NN i12 470 019
R/"lii'ii%:$ril'.,'fi );r:'*:gi'BAff 3.a:J.:il:g.,.,t"fiJ",."T?andDistrict
AND ...PETITIONER
(R-4 is not necessary party)
Petttion under Articre 226 or the constitution of rndia ,;;f;ffi3ilt:T: circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be preased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS under Arricre 226 of constitution of rndia declaring the action of the Respondents in caling for second paner for the post of Addr. pubric prosecutor in Vl Additional District and Sessions court, Mahbubabad District ignoring the first panel sent on 02108120i8 as illegal arbitrary violative of section 24 ol cr.p.c. and Andhra Pradesh Law officers/ Appointment and conditions of service lnstructions 2000 brought in through vide G.o.Ms.No.187 dated o6li2l2ooo and also violative of rights conferred in Part lll of constitution of lndia and pass such other order as this Honble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and consequently to direct the Respondents to consider the earlier panel. lA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in calling for second proposal for Additional public prosecutor Post vide Letter No. Rc.No.C1120712018, dt.14lOEl2019 pertaining to Additional Public Prosecutor Post in Vl Addl. District and Sessions Court, tr/ahabubabad, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. VENKAT RED
DONTHI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1, 2 & 4: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR HOME
The Courl made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLESRT JUSTICE K' LAKSHMAN
WEII.fETI@
ORDER:
Learned cottnsel for tht: petitionersfiled a lettcrdatcd O1.lO.2O2l beforethe Registry seeking permission o[ this Court to withclrau'the presentn'rit petition'
Permissiott is act:orde11.
Accordinglv. this writ Petition 1S <lismissed tl li
rvitl-rdrawrr. No costs.
Miscellancous petitions, if anv, pending, shallstand
close r1.
SD/. K.SAILESHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
To,
'/SECTION OFFICER
1 2 9n" Two CCs QQto toSri Venkat Reddy Donthi Gp for Revenu6, High Courti5iin" Sili't"'6ir"r#gana. Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] [oUT] 4 2CD CopiesTwo CCs to Gp for Home High 6orrt f"i ii;'Si"t";liierangrana. louTl One Spare Copies CHR
k-)
HIGHCOURT
DATED:0511012021
ORDER
W.P.No.12167of 2019
'i irE s TAI€
(
oo 1 6 0[T?I]21 o
*
l)r,:.,l,tr''
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
RIT PETITION I12
Secretary to the Government, Legal Affairs
K. LAKSHMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
