The petitioner applied for a writ of mandamus to quash removal proceedings as Up-Sarpanch and for a stay. The court permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition and dismissal of a stay petition under Section 151 CPC, discharging both without costs.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; stay petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE ST r"r;i,Ii6l5,Pj lf,Lf#f,flf Ar HvDERABAD
,\4ONDAY, THE F " ril ;r.^t JlfliflIpfi,?.Jo.
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO. 8571 OF 2021
Between:
Smtpallepati Suguna, W/o p.Shekar, Aged ab
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to grant an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare the proceedings in Letter No.100/2021lA2-pts-2 D1.2310312021 whereby directing the 7th respondent to initiate action to remove the petitioner from office of the 6th respondent basing upon the no confidence motion conducted on 1610312021 by the 4th respondent without following due procedure of law as illegal arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to rule framed under G.O.lrzls.No. 200 PR and RD Dt.28104/1998 and violtive of Article 14 and 21 of the constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent Nos.2 to 4 to allow and continue the petitioner as Up-Sarpanch for lvlalkapur Village, Toopran Mandal, N/edak District. lA NO: 1 OF 202'l
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in suppofi of thepetition, the High Court may bepleasedto stay all further proceedings including removal of thepetitioner from theoffice of the 6th respondent inpursuance of theproceedingsin letterNo.100/2021lA2-Pts-2dated 2310312021,pending disposal of the writpetition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. KRISHNA SWAROOP
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1, 3 & 5: GPFOR PANCHAYAT RAJ AND
RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2& 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI G.NARENDER REDDY'
S.C, FOR GPPIMPPIZPP
Counsel for the Respondent No.7: SRIP. SUDHEERRAO,
S.C. FOR ELECTION COMMISSION
The Court made the following: ORDER
THEHONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K'LAKSHMAN
wzu
TPETITIONN o.857lo f 2A2l
oRDER:
iearnedcounsel lbrthe Sri V.iirishnaSwaioop' petitioner,seeks permissionof this Court to f ithdraw tht: present WritPetition. He has also frled a letterdated 30.Og.20'21beibrethe Registi-vto thateffect'
Permissionis grarited and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.'Ikrere sha1l be noorrler zrs tocosts Miscellaneouspetitions,if a-r'rv, pencling,sha1l stand closed
SD/.K.AMMAJI ASSTSTANTREGISTRAR
//TRUECOPY'
SECTIONOFFICER
To. '"'1 . On" CC to Sri V. Krishna Swaroop, Advoc€te [OPUCI 2. rwo ccsto GP r"I. P;;;;;;fii;ill]'i n'i''r-o"ueiopment'Hish court for the State of Telanganaat HyderabadLUU II - 3. Two ccsto GP f;; ''R;;;;;;'iligl^" co"t for the state of Telansanaat Hvderabad. [OUT] +. iji,!'cdi,is'ic.i'larenoer Reddv, S C for GPP/IvIPP/ZPP(oP-U-C)^. E. 5;;66 i; sriF. sron""i'irolslbtot Election commission(oPUc)
l\i P
HIGH COURT
DATED:0411012021
ORDER
WP.No.8571 of 2021
riE T4 r4r
a'
2 2 f][T20?t
o()t
I
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
lt
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Smt. Suguna
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayat Raj and Rural Development
The District Collector, Medak District
The District Panchayat Officer, Medak District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Toopran Division, Medak District
The Matalkapur Grampanchayat, Rep. by its panchayat Secretary
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
