The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by an outdoor advertisement agency challenging the removal of banners due to the efflux of time, deeming the cause infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A, ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 1180 OF20'19
Between:
M/s. siqns Outdoor Advertisinq,a partnershipfirmhavingits registeredofficeat H.No. 3-6-530/'1 , Street No.7,Himayatnagar, Hyderabad-soo034. represented by its lvlanaging Partner, B.Prabhakar,S/o. SripathRao,45years.
...pETt,oNER
AND
"RESP.NDENTS
Petition under Article226 of the constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court may be pleased toissueanappropriatewrit'orderordirection,moreinthenatureofMandamus' declaring the respondentsin trying to removethe advertisementarches erectedat Begumpet Flyover interms of the permission accorded on 8 8'2014and the agreement dated2'1 .12.2015 though the same is extendablefor a furtherperiod of (3)yearsaSpertheConditionNo..lofthesaidagreementthattooevenwithout puttingthepetitioneronnotiCeorgivinganyopportunityasbeingillegal,arbitrary' contrary to the conditionsof Agreement and also in violationof principlesof natural justice, and Article 14 of the Constitutionof lndia and consequently declare that the petitioner is entitled to continueits business for a further period of (3) years'
lA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section'l 51CPC praying that in the circumstancesstatedin theaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighcourtmaybepleasedtodirect the respondentsnot to interferewith the smooth coduct of its businessin terms of the allotmentof contract throughthe proceedings dated 8.8.2014and the conditions of Agreementexecuted in pursuance thereof on 21 '12'2015' pending disposalof the above writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI M. RAMBABU
Counsel forRespondent No. 1: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION& URBAN OEVELOPMENT
Counsel forRespondent Nos' 2 to 4: SRI PASHAM KRISHNA REDDY
The Court madethe following:ORDER
I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION No. 118O of2Ol9
ORDER:
Due to efflux of time, the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
The miscellaneous petitions pending, if anv, shall stand
closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/.K.AMMAJI
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
One CC to Sri M Rambabu Advocate [OPUCI
1
2 Two CCs to GP For Municipal Administration & Urban Development, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]
J. One CC to Sri Pasham Krishna Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) 4. Two CD Copies
HIGH COURT
DATEDfi110712021
n!
1 $e s r,r 16:
'(
ltI or)) 2 0 JUI fll?f oz
\ "t<br>Y,+ t
D€." DaTC
ORDER
WP.No.1180 of 2019
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS
INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS ,
Yo\s
,<br>14)
M/s. siqns Outdoor Advertisinq
The State of Telangana
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
