Disposed

Visweswarayya Memorial High School, Mahaboobnagar. v. the State of Ts.,Mun.Admn.,Hyderabad, and 2 Otrs.

Telangana HC1 Jul 2021WP/10714/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana closed Writ Petition No. 10714 of 2017 filed by Visweswarayya Memorial High School regarding an illegal property tax demand. The Court held no further orders were needed in light of interim orders already granted.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition closed without costs; miscellaneous petitions pursuing, if any, shall stand closed.

Visweswarayya Memorial High School… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original J urisdiction)

¶2

THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.^{ABHISHEKREDDY}

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 10714 OF 2017

¶6

Between:

¶7

Visweswarayya l,4emorial High School,^{(EnglishMedium} ),^{Lingam Bagh Colony,} Gadwal, trlahaboobnagar District,^{representedbyits Cha} irman & Correspondent, Sri P. Chandrasekharaiah S/o P. Ramulu aged⁶⁷

¶8

.,.PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

1 . State of Telangana, Rep. by its Secretary,^{MunicipalAdministration & Urban} Development,^{-Government-of} Telangand,^{Secretariat Bldgs. HydSrabad}

¶11

1. Gadwai lvlunicipality, Gadwal represented^{by its Commissioner, Gadwal,} l,4ahboobnagar District

¶12

3, lvlunicipal Council, represented^{by its Chairman, Gadwal, Mahaboobnagar} District

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution^{of lndiapraying that in the} circumslances stated in the affidavit^{filed therewith,the High Court may be pleased} to issue a Writ, Direction, or Order,^{particularlyone in the nature of Mandamus} declaring the demand notice dated^{18.3.2017issued by the secondrespondent} towards property tax and arrears^{with respect to the building in which the Schoolis} being run as illegal

¶15

l.A. NO: 2 OF 201 TIWPMP. NO: 13278^{OF 201 7</sup>}

¶16

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in thecircumstances statedin} the affidavit flled in support of the^{petition,theHigh Court may be pleased to stay} the demand made by the 2nd respondent in his^{Demand Notice dated 18-03-2017} directing the Petitioner School to^pay the^{Property Tax and arrears with respect to} the School building bearing^No. 7-10-59/4 and^{7-10'68/4pending disposalof the} above writ^petition.

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI R.^{V. NAGABUSHNAM RAO}

¶18

Gounsel for Respondent No. 1: GP^{FORMUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION&} URBAN DEVELOPMENT

¶19

Counsel for Respondent Nos.^{2 & 3: SRI N. PRAVEEN KUMAR,} SC FOR MUNICIPALITIES

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

¶22

THE HON'BLE^{SRIJUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY}

¶23

WRIT PETITI^{ON No' 10714ot 2Ql7}

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

In view of^{the interimordersgranted b1' this Courton} 27.03.2017,^{no furtherorders need be passedin this u'rit} petition.

¶26

Hence, the writ^{petitionis closed ln casethe official} respondents^{intend to take any actionagainstthe petitioner'} they shall do^{so strictly in accordance withlaw'}

¶27

The miscellaneous^{petitionspending' if any'sha11 stand}

¶28

closed. There^{shallbe no orderas to costs}

¶29

SD/.K.ONESIM ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR //TRUE^COPY// d

¶30

SECTION^OFFICER

¶31

'o'',.^{on" CC to Sri R V NagabushnamRaoAdvoca-te[oPUq} 2 rwo ccs to^{cp ro' rvr,'iiliiiil;;i;'-1"ilil;e-u'roanD'evetopment'Hish court} j l, ." ro,. Municiparities( op U c) . 3ly33lT"dt,[i?:93:3'l3H

¶32

Two CD^CoPies

¶33

One Spare^CoPY

[,18C

/a Y

HIGH COURT

AAR,J

DATED: 0110712021

..:t:1,-
\ $e STAIi. cA
k
?
o 2 B F'rts 20?2
..!

¶41

ORDER

¶42

WP.No.10714 of²⁰¹⁷

¶43

CLOSING THE WRIT^PETITION

¶44

WITHOUT COSTS

¶45

c.ogic$
@
b-
-a}w

Visweswarayya Memorial High School, Mahaboobnagar. v. the State of Ts.,Mun.Admn.,Hyderabad, and 2 Otrs.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Visweswarayya Memorial High School, Mahaboobnagar. v. the State of Ts.,Mun.Admn.,Hyderabad, and 2 Otrs.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Venkatesh, And Another Vs State of Telangana, And 11 Others

M/s. Subhanallah Construction Pvt. Ltd., Vs Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation

Brand Boutique Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation

M/s. signs Outdoor Advertising Vs The State of Telangana

Manchikatla Kamalakar,and 9 Vs Govt.of Telangana,Prl.Scy,M.a.D,Hyd,Andanot

Atkapuram Sharadha Vs Smt Bharathi Hollikeri,(Ias)