Dismissed

M/ s. Logos Travels v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC20 Jul 2021WP/11089/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition challenging a tax demand and attachment order, dismissing it as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the underlying tribunal order, while closing ancillary petitions. (Note: This summarizes the procedure and outcome without naming specific parties.)

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the final order of the CESTAT. Miscellaneous petitions stood closed.

M/ s. Logos Travels Vs The State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE 51 (s,;H,'61:,:j l:,!lji!,fli^{Ar HYDERABAD}

¶2

TUESDAY, TH-E TWENTIETH DAY OF JULY TWo rHousAND AND rwEr.rrv olri.

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO AND

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR

¶6

Between:

¶7

WRIT PET tTto N NO: 110 89 0F 2021

¶8

IV/ s Looos Travers. Having its office at D.No.2-56133,,. 4-vvgppq Society, rvadhapur, Hyderabad Reoresenrerj 5y. its N/anigrng';jr;;i" N/r.Kadari Krishna. S/o. Kadari Pochaiah. aqed about Or Vears, RloI i:s/1, ir"r.d_eroi["0_i, 'c;ii;]r"#gr;p"t, Hyderabad.

¶9

...PET|T|ONER

¶10

AND

¶11

l The State of relangana, Rep. by principar secretary, Revenue (sr), secretariat, Hyderabad

¶12

Commissioner of Central Tax and Customs, Hyderabad lV, posnett Bhavan, Tilak Road, Ramkote, Hyderabad-SOO 001, Teianqana

¶13

Deputy Commissioner of Central Tax, Gachibowli:GST Division.

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, direction or order more partrcularly in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the demand notice dated 2610212021 issued by Respondent No.2 for attachment of immovable property of the^petitioner located at.H.No.1-9/1, Ward^Block 0-1, Guttala Begumpet, Hyderabad as being void, illegal,^{arbitrary, and} u n constitutiona I and conSequently direct the^{Respondentsnot to take any coercive} steps for recovery of the disputed tax of^{Rs.3,15'14,012/- pending disposalof the} appeal before the cusloms, central^{Exciseand serviceTax Appellate Tribunal.} lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶16

Petition under section 151^{CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the} affidavit filed in support^{of the petition, the High court may be pleasedto suspend the} demand notice dated^{26-02-2021issued by Respondent No'r. for attachment of} immovable^{property of the petitioner locatedat H.No.1.9/1, Ward BIock 0.1} '^Guttala Begumpet, Hyderabad.

¶17

IA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶18

Petition under^{Section151 CPC prayingthatin the circumstances stated in the} affidavit filed^{in supportof the petition,the HighCourt may be pleased to stay the} collectionoftaxpursuanttotheeffectualorderAppealNo'ST/1474111dated 09t0712019.

lt2ll

lA NO: 3^{OF 2021}

Between:

1 iri;ii'R;;; commissioner R"mtoG,^{of central Hvoeraoad-S0o Tax and customs, 001,TelansanaHyderabadlv, Posnett Bhavan'} 2 ;"t iy"6;";^{,iiisJ;;;,.,;i b; ;t,-J i rax, Gacnibowri'G Sr D'vision'}

¶23

... Petitionerrs/Respondents^{2 & 3}

¶24

AND

¶25

lvl/s. Loqos^{Travels, Havingits office at D'No'2-5-6/33/7' |yyqpqa.P.o9i9tY'} iiilinSoi. Hvouij#0.^{n"piEsJnteoby its Manasing,pafiner,Mr.Kadari fiqll,} 516l xToiii ioihaian,^{ased'iboui-01 vears, Ryo.-r-61t, ward-Block 0-1, Guttala} Begumpet, HYderabad.

¶26

...ResPondenUWrit^Petitioner

¶27

The state of Telangana,^{Rep. by Principalsecretary,Revenue(sT), secretariat,} Hyderabad.

¶28

.RespondenURespondent¹

¶29

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstances stated in the} affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Court may be pleased to vacate the} interim order passed in l.A.No.2 of 2021 in W.P.No.110BO of 2021 dated 27'04-2021^. lA NO: 4 OF 2021

¶30

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circ(rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interimorderpassedinl.A.No.'l of 2021 inW.P.No.110B9of 2021 daled2T-04-2021 .

¶31

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. S.S.R. MURTHY

¶32

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR REVENUE

¶33

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3: SRI DOMtNtC FERNII$DES

¶34

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶35

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO

¶36

AND

¶37

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR

¶38

Writ Petition No.tl089 of 2021

¶39

ORDER : tper St.i ,lu,rtice M S. Rcrnec.hattLhn Raot

¶40

The counsel for petitioner(s) seeks to wilhdraw the Writ petition with liberty to chatlenge rhe Final Order dt.09.07.2019 passed by the C.E.S.T.A.T.. Hyderabad.

¶41

Granting liberty as sought, the Writ petition is disrnissed as rvithdrawn.

¶42

3" As a sequel, nrisceiianeous petitions pending if any in this Writ

¶43

Pct it ion, shall stand closed.

SDI B.SATYAVATHI

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

,TRUE COPY'

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1 One CC to Sri S.S R. l,4urthy, Advocate [OPUC] 2 Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court^{for the State of Telanganaat} Hvderabad. IOUTI

¶50

3 Oire CC to Sri Dominic Fernandes,^Advocate tOPUCI 4. Two CD Copies

¶51

One Spare Copy CHR .V

,+-,,-

HIGH^COURT

DATED:2010712021

ORDER

Y rA ref
1
g
Joo 0 6 AUG2021
-l
1: 1

¶57

W.P.No.11089 of²⁰²¹

¶58

DISMISSING THE WRIT^PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.

¶59

atlloB
^,5 <br>0

M/ s. Logos Travels v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/ s. Logos Travels v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. R.K.Exports Vs The State of Telangana

Prl Commr of Income TAX-2, Hyderabad Vs M/S Ijm [India] Infrastructure Ltd., Hyderabad

The Comm. of Income TAX-2, Hyderabad Vs M/S Ijm (India) Infrastructure Ltd., Hyderabad

Dr. Kumbha Brahmaiah Vs The Union of India

M/s. Daftri Agro Vs Ito, Ward-2

M/s.Daftri Agro Vs Ito