Allowed

M/s. Daftri Agro v. Ito, Ward-2

Telangana HC20 Jul 2021ITTA/55/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an Income Tax Tribunal appeal to be withdrawn by the appellant, who filed an application under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive it if the dispute remains unsatisfied.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn with liberty to revive it if the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, remains unresolved.

M/s. Daftri Agro Vs Ito, Ward-2 — Telangana HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH GOURT FOR AT HYDTJREABIITE^{OF TELANGANA}

¶2

ruElP^4y, IHE TWENIETH DAY oF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI J rH E H o N o u Ro,.. **flfll,[: T,ffili ;H::^*"

¶5

lNco E TAX TR BU PE L o F 12

¶6

(lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260 A of the lncome Tax Act, against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ,8,, Hyderabad in rrA No. 1,srHydr2oo7 for assessment year 2003-04 dated 30_09_20.10 preferred against the Order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals ) _V, Hvderabad in rrA No' 083 & 082 /rro-w-2/MBNR /Crr (A) -Vro6-07 dated 1 o-.r 1-2006 preferred against the order of the rncome -Tax officer, ward-2 Mahabubnagar PAN/clR No. D- 323 dated 31_03_2006 )

¶7

Between:

¶8

lV/s. Daftri Agro,9l17S, Station Road, Mahabubnagar

¶9

,AND

¶10

...APPELLANT

¶11

lTO, Ward-2, Mahabubnagar.

¶12

...RESPONDENT

¶13

Counsel for the Appellant: SRI A. V. KRISHNA KOUNDtNyA

¶14

Counsel for the Respondent:

¶15

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶16

HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEM'SRAMACHANDRARAO}

¶17

AND

¶18

HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE T' VINOD KUMAR}

¶19

I.T.T.A.N^{o.5) of 2012}

¶20

JUDGMENT:^{(PerSri Justice M S'Ramachandra Rao)}

¶21

The counsel^{for appellant has fileda letter dt'16'07 '2021 seeking} to withdraw^{the Appeal stating that the appellanthas made an} application^{to the CentralBoard of Direct Taxes under the Direct Tax} Vivad se Vishwas^{Act,2020, and that Form - 3 had been issued by the} designatecl^{authority approving the application madeby the assessee'}

¶22

2, Having regard^{to the saidsubmission' the appeliant is permitted to} withdraw^{the appeal with liberty to revive it in the eventthere is no} satisfactory^{resolution of the dispute betweenthe parties under the said} Act.

¶23

-t Granting^{liberlyas sought, the Appeal is dismissedas withdrawn'} No order as to^costs'

¶24

As a sequel, miscellaneous^{petitions pendingif any in this Appeal'}

¶25

shall stand closed.

¶26

SDIM.SH^{ANTHI VARDHINI} JOINT^REGISTRAR

¶27

//TRUE^COPY//

¶28

SECTION^OFFICER

¶29

'o',1 . ,n"^{lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal' Hyderabad Bench 'B" Hyderabad}

¶30

The Commissioner^{of lncome Tax (Appeals) -V' Hyderabad}

¶31

The lncome^{Tax Officer, Ward'2, Mahabubnagar'}

¶32

one CC to Sri A. V. Krishna^{Koundinya, Advocate} [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies 6. One Spare Copy Kul gbr \.

¶33

HIGH^COURT

¶34

DATED:^2010712021

¶35

I T'. r€
1
d 04 AUC2[tl
*
oFr o 1-f

¶36

ORDER

¶37

|TTA.No.S5^o12012

¶38

DISMISSING THE ITTA^{AS WITHDRAWN}

¶39

WITHOUT COSTS

¶40

/./

M/s. Daftri Agro v. Ito, Ward-2

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Daftri Agro v. Ito, Ward-2

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. R.K.Exports Vs The State of Telangana

Prl Commr of Income TAX-2, Hyderabad Vs M/S Ijm [India] Infrastructure Ltd., Hyderabad

The Comm. of Income TAX-2, Hyderabad Vs M/S Ijm (India) Infrastructure Ltd., Hyderabad

Dr. Kumbha Brahmaiah Vs The Union of India

M/ s. Logos Travels Vs The State of Telangana

M/s.Daftri Agro Vs Ito