Dismissed

Prl Commr of Income TAX-2, Hyderabad v. M/S Ijm [India] Infrastructure Ltd., Hyderabad

Telangana HC19 Jul 2021ITTA/201/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed an Income Tax Tribunal Appeal as withdrawn by the appellant, who filed a letter seeking liberty to withdraw after the respondent applied under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2020.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to withdraw the appeal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn without costs; pending miscellaneou petitions dismissed.

Prl Commr of Income TAX-2, Hyderabad Vs M/S Ijm [India]… — Income Tax | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE^{STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶2

MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH^{DAY OF JULY} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{M.S.RAMACHANDRARAO} AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{T.VINOD KUMAR}

¶5

INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL^{APPE AL NO:201OF 2017}

¶6

(lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under section^{260A of the lncome Tax Act,1961against} Hyderabad in the order of the^{lncome Tax AppellateTribunal, Hyderabad Bench'A} " lTANo,l4STtHydt2Ol4forAssessmentYear20l0-2011dated.24.08.2016.

¶7

Between:

¶8

The Principal Commissioner^{of lncome Tax-2,Hyderabad}

¶9

...Appella nt

¶10

AND

¶11

t,4/ UM^(lndia) lnfrastructure^{Limited,1-90/A,Plot No 20 and 21, RBI Colony'} Madhadur, Hyderabad-500081,

¶12

...Respondent

¶13

Counsel for the^{Appellant:M/s K. MAMATA}

¶14

Counsel for the Respondent:^{SRI C. V. NARASIMHAM}

¶15

The Court made^{the following:JUDGMENT}

¶16

I] ONOI.I II.A I}L I]^S RI^{.I L] S1' IC I] M.S.RAM ACHAN I) IIA ITAO}

¶17

AND

¶18

HONOI,RABLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD^KUN'I,AII

¶19

I.T.T.A. NO.20l OF 2017

¶20

JUDGME NT:

¶21

(Pet Sri Justice M.S.Rahachandra Rao)

¶22

Ms. K. Mamata Chowdary, leamed Standing Counsel^{for Income}

¶23

Tax Department has filed a letter requesting to^{permit the appellantto} n,ithdrau, this Appeal on the ground that the respondent had filed an Application unclel the'Direct'l-ax Vivad Se Vishwas Schenre, 2020^with libcrll' ,u lcvivc the Appeal in the evc'nt o1' lniltrre of satislircton rcsolLrtion unrlel the saicl Schenre.

¶24

I Iearri the lcalned counsel 1br the Appellant and Sri

¶25

C.'.\alasirnlranr. lt'arnecl counse I fbr thc rcsponclent.

¶26

Cranting liberty as sought. this Appeal is disnrissed as rvithdrawn.

¶27

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this Appeal shall also

¶28

stand dismissed. No costs.

¶29

SD/. B.S.^CHIRANJEEVI JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE^COPY// Qd

¶30

SECTION^OFFICER

¶31

To, Hyderabad 1 . The lncome^{Tax AppellateTribunal' Hyderabad Bench ' A} " 2. i'n" IJJiil"lricommissioner^{of lncome Tax' Range-2'Hyderabad'} J. o"L cC to^{M/s K. MAMATA' Advocate [oPUC]} -^-. . 4 6;; aa io^{snr c v NARASIMHAM, Advocate[oPUC]} 5 Two CD CoPies [/lv'lK

HIGH^COURT

MSRJ & TVKJ

DATED:19/07/2021

JUDGMENT

|TTA.No.Z01^{ol 2017}

¶37

{ e s TArt
1r 7
G:
o
LJ\ 0t h1]s2t21
', 4
D!:S pAi a,

¶38

DISMISSING THE^{ITTA AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUTCOSTS}

¶39

c/
I

Prl Commr of Income TAX-2, Hyderabad v. M/S Ijm [India] Infrastructure Ltd., Hyderabad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prl Commr of Income TAX-2, Hyderabad v. M/S Ijm [India] Infrastructure Ltd., Hyderabad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Suvishal Power Gen Limited Vs The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation and 4 Others

Javick Implex (P) Limited, Plot No. 26, Road No. 1 Vs The Commercial Tax Officer, Basheerbagh

M/s. Nitin Fordging And Steel Industries Vs Commercial Tax Officer

M/s. R.K.Exports Vs The State of Telangana

The Comm. of Income TAX-2, Hyderabad Vs M/S Ijm (India) Infrastructure Ltd., Hyderabad

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Vs M/s. Ijm (India) Infrastructure Ltd.