Dismissed
Macha Prashanth v. The State of Telangana
Telangana HCWP/10555/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special…
What the court decided
AI extract
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
WRIT PETITION NO:'t0555 OF 2021
Between:
lvlacha Prashanth, S/o Devadas, aged about 28 years, Occ.Business, Rlo 4-44, Cheelapur Village, Bejjanki Mandal, Siddipet District, (Lessee of Shop No.3, Grampanchayath Office Complex, Bejjanki Village and Mandal, Siddipet District)
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of It4andamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in conducting the Lucky draw system in place of Auction called on 3110312021 as illegal, arbitrary, bad in liw and consequently direct the 4th respondent to renew the lease period for Shop No.3 for a further period of 2 years lrom 2021-2023.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedrngs pursuant to the notice vide Letter No. G.p.B. No.i3l2021, d1.30.03.2o21 including the eviction of the petitioner from Shop No.3. situated at lejiankiGrampanchyathshopingcompled, Bejlanki Viilageand mandal.Siddipet District, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI y. RAVINDRA PRASAD
Gounsel for the Respondent No.'t: cp FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.2 to 4: SRI G. NARENDER REDDY,
SC FOR GRAMPANCHAYAT
The Court made the following: ORDER
T}IE HON'BLE SRI JL]STICE T. ANIARNATH GOLit)
\'RIT PE'IITION No.10555 of 202 I
()l{l)l:lt:
lrr rieu of tl're Ietter clared 04.06.201 1 olthc leartrcd cotrnsel lbt'
petitioner seeking permission lor withdrarval ol the u'ritpetition,this
writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No orderas to costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall standclosed.
SD/. K.SAILESHI ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
\
SECTIONOFFICER
to'.,.
sm
HIGH COURT
DATED:08/06/2021
ORDER
WP.No.10555 ot 2021
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
I
1 NE ST4 16
<'
e
'J {' r
o
I O 1I iui! t$?l
t,c-:
+.'
lvlacha Prashanth
The State of Telangana
The Panchayath Raj Officer, Siltlapraja parish;d
The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Be1'janki M'andal
The Bejjanki Grampanchayath
T. Amarnath Goud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court