Minimum pay-scale entitlement of daily-wage employees was in dispute. The court disposed of the writ appeals with liberty to the parties to argue all points before the Single Judge, without deciding the merits.
Liberty to the parties to argue all points before the Single Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THESTATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
II I
I
FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTHDAY OF NOVE[/]BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEFJUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKERREDDY
WRIT APPEAL NOS:243 .248,38't.382& 393 0F 2019
wA NO.243 0F 2019:
Writ Appeal under clause'15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the orderdated 17t1212018 in l.A.No.1 of 2017 inW.P.No.39928of2017 onthefileof the High court.
Between:
The Mandal Praja parishad Development Officer
Varni Mandal, Nizamabad Distrjct, Telangana State
..... Appellant/ Respondent No.20 _ AND
Aged about 44 years, Occ: Bore well Mechanic Working at Varni Ma nda I
Nizamabad District, Telangana State ... Respondent /petitioner No.12
2.D. Uppalaiah, S/o. Saitu
Aged about 49 years, Occ: Bore well Mechanic Working at Mahabubabad Mandal
Mahabubabad District, Telangana State
Mahabubabad District, Telangana State
Mahabubabad District, Telangana State at'
Agr.:d about 37 years, Occ: Bore well Mechanic
Working at tvla ripeda Mandal
Mahabubabad District, Telangana State
6, E. Narasaiah, S/o. Ramaiah Aged about 35 years, Occ: Bore well tvlechanlc Working at Narsimulapeta tvlandal
Mahabubabad District, Telangana State /.
l4ahabubaba! District, Tetangana State
.t'
V
) fL
. Vrlr tll
Be
---a-
q
'..q Sudam 9. R. Bhujang,S/o. Aged abQut 39y€ lrs; Occ: Bore well Mechanic Wqrking at Edapt ly Mandal
/'i
Nizamabad Distri, t, Telangana State
,,,
I I
I I I t
/
21._The District panchayat Raj Of licer Siddipet"District, Siddipet .,',.
3 r
Nellikduru vl an da Mahabubabad District Telangana State I .li
/
, I J
"&&il3s!!.{fixi,n:$81; "Sl:lJ"r,officer, Lingampeta rvlandat, to 21 & 23 to 3z are not necessarIgjIHiBLrrc IA NO;20 F2019 petition under Section 151 C PC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidav,t fiied in support of the , petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lnterim Order dated 1711212018 passed by the learned
.'-q--
Single Judge in lA N t.l of 2017 in W.P. No. 39928 ot 2O1T on the fite of the Honourable High Cour . of Telangana and AP at Hyderabad, pending disposal of the main Writ Appeal
Counsel for the Appel ant: SRI G. NARENDER REDDY SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT
Counsel for Respondr nt No. 1: PRABHAKAR CHIKKUDU
Counsel for Respondr nt Nos, 1 6 to 18 & 22: GP FOR pANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT
WA NO: 248 OF 2019
writ Appeal under clar se 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 17-12-2018in1.A.No.1 tf2017inwPNo.39928of2017onthefileoftheHighcourt.
Between:
,.The lvlandalPraja par shad Development Officer ' Gandhari Mandal, Kar rareddy District, fetanfana State
AND Appeilant/ Respondent No.22 .-_1. Ch. venugopa I, S/c. Narayana Aged about 49 yei rs, Occ: Bore well Mechanic Working at Gandh rri Mandal Kamaredd2t dstric:, Terangana state ... Respondent /petitioner No,74-.-r
\
2.D, Uppalaiah, S/o. ! ailu Aged about 49 year;, Occ: Bore well Mechanic Working at tyahabu )abad Mandal Mahabubabgd Distr :t, Telangana State /'
I i
t,-
'' Nizamabad District, Telangana State
Nizamabad Dlstrict, Telangana State
Nizamabad District, Telangana State
Nizamabad District, Telangana State
Kamareddy District, Telangana State
/"
/
('(-.{ g
\
I
Navipet findal,Kamareddy District, Tel angana State
37.The Mandal pr Kamareddv Di (Res pond6ntliiif:?!;3,?:'31:1J""'orricer, Linsampetar,y'andar ,ros. 2 to 15, 1e to 22 & 24 to 37 are no, n".":.:fi!r.tsUliir"l*r, IAN o :2OF 201 I petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operatic n of the lnterim Order dated 17112 2018 passed by the learned
ll i I I I
\
-- )---
Single Judge in lA No,1 of 2017 in w.p. No. 39928 of 2017 onthe fire of the Hon,bre High court of relangana and Ap at Hyderabad, pending disposar of the main writ Appeal
Counsel for the Appeilant: SRt G. NARENDER REDDY SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT
Counsel for Respondent No. 1: PRABHAKAR CHTKKUDU
counsel for Respondent Nos. 16 to 1g & 23: Gp FoR pANcHAyAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT
WA NO: 381 oF 2019
writ Appeal under crause 15 of the Letters patent preferred against the order dated 1711212018in1.A.No.1 of 2017 inwpNo.3992Bof 2olTonthefileoftheHighcourl. Between:
The Ma nda I Praj6'pa rishad Development Officer Edapally Mandal, Nizamabad District, Telangana State
Mahabubabad District, Telangana State
Mahabubabad District, Telangana State
Mahabubabad D istrict, Telangana State
Mahabubabad District, Telangana State
Mahabubabad District, Telangana State _/
Nizamabad District, Telangana State
7_
!!
I :,
I
i I u I
A
q
g. s. aanudnth0, S/o,vlallaiah Aged aboLt 40years, )cc: Borewell Mechanic Working at Nandipetlv andal Niza mabadzPistrict,T€ ,angana State
r
Aged about 44 Yeat,, Occ:Bore wetl Mechanic Worklng at Varni'Mt ndal
Kamareddy District, TelanganaState
I I
Aged about 38yearl , Occ: Bore wellMechanic Working at Banswad : lYandal
Kamared/ District, felangana State
: i
rt t I
tI l I I I I I i
Kamaredd/ District, [elanga na State /
Kamareddy District, TelanganaState ...Respondents/ PetitionerNos.2to 15
,,,
17, The State of Telang :na, Rep. by its Principal ;ecretarY, To the Panchayat Ra & Rural Development,
Secretarial, Hyderab td,
\
:
.'-4
I
/'
{
t
\
lA NO: 2 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lnterim Order dated 1711212018 passed by the learned
)
r
t I I
\ i
I
lo
Single Judgein lA No. of 2017 in w.P.No.39928 of 2017 on the file of the Honble HighCourtofTelangaraandAPatHyderabad,pendingdisposalofthemainWrit Appeal and topass
Counsel for the Appeltant: SRI G' NARENDER REDDY SC FOR GRAMPANCHAYAT
Counsel for Respondent No. 1: PRABHAKAR CHIKKUDU
Counsel for Respondent Nos' 16 to 18 &22: GP FORPANCHAYAT RAJ& RURAL DEVELOPMENT
WA NO: 382 0F2019
writ Appeal underclat se 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the orderdated 07-12-2018in l.A.No.1rt 2017 in wP No. 39928of 2018 on the file of the High court.
Between:
;had DeveloPmentOff icer ,,TheMandal 'PrajaPar / $aripeda Mandal, Ma rabubabadDistrict, Telangana ..iRPPetlant/StateResPondentNo'10 / / AND /' - 1. B. Bicha,S/o. Dan Ya ngeO about37 yea rs/ Occ:Bore well Mechan IC Working atMariPe ia Mandal UahabubaOadDist -ict, TelanganaState Respondent /PetitionerNo'4 --- a 2.D. UpPalaia h, S/o. lailu 1C Aged about 49yea's,Occ:Borewell Mechan Working at Mahabr babadMandal Mahabubab Dist ict, TelanganaState
il-
\
. worktng at Navipet Mandal NizamaladiDistrict, Telangana State /
i I I I I I I
...Respondents/ petitioner Nos.2 to 15
langana
/
I I I i ,
i I
\.---
{
)
xamar{ay bis r.ict, Nizamabad
I
I i i
..,RESPONDENTS IA NO: 2 oF 2019
Petition ur der section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired ir support of the petition, the High court may be preased to suspend the operatior of the rnterim order dated 17r121201g passed by the rearned
r
\
l)
Single Judge in lA No.1 of 2o1z in w.p. No. 39928 of 2017 on the fire of the Honbre High cou,. of rerangana and Ap at Hyderabad, pending disposar of the main writ Appeal
Counsel for the Appellant; SRt G. NARENDER REDDY SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT
Counsel for Respondent No. 1: PRABHAKAR CHIKKUDU
Counsel for Respondent Nos. 16 to 18 & 20: Gp FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT WAN o: 393 0F 2019
t:
writ Appeal under crause 1s of the Letters patent prefe'ed against the order dated 1711212018 in r.A.No.1 of 2017 in w.p.No. 3gg2l ot 2o,rz. on the fire of the High court.
Between:
The IYandal praja parishad Development Officer NandipetlMandal, Nizamabad District, i"f ung"anu Stut.
.... Appellant/ Respondent No.17 AND 1. B. Hanumanthu, S/o. tvtallaiah Aged about 40 years, Occ: Bore well Mechanic Working at Nandipet Mandal Nizamabad District, Telangana State
Respondent /petitioner No.9 2,D. Uppataiah, S/0. Sailu Aged about 49 years, Occ: Bore well Mechanic working at Mahabubabad lvlandal Mahabubabad District, Telangana State
Mahabubgbad District, Telangana State
Mahabub/b3d Disrrict, Tetangana State
,/
Mahabubpbad District, Tetangana State
Nizamabad District, Telangana State
I I
)\ 6. *. ,nr:u'(g:i/o. :;udam W Aged abogt 39. yei rs,.Occ: Bore well Mechanic Worllng at Edapal y Mandat NizamabatDistric, Telangana State
10.V. Shivashankar, S/o. Dondiba
Aged about 43 yr ars, Occ: Bore well Mechanic
Working at Kotag ri Mandal
Nizamabap Distri :t, Telangana State
./'
Aged about 36 y:ars, Occ: Bore well Mechanic - Working at Navil et Mandal Nizamabad Distr ct, Telangana State
.-.
Aged about 44 y nrs, Occ: Bore well Mechanic
Working at Varn Mandal
r,amarepy bistr ct, Telangana State
Kamareddy Distri :t, Telangana State !/'/;,
Aged about 49 yea'rs, Occ: Bore well Mechanic
Working at Gandl ari Mandal
Kamareddy Distri :t, Telangana State
Aged about 44 ye:rs, Occ; Bore well Mechanic Working at Lingal eta Mandal
Kamareddy Distri :t, Telangana State
To the Panchayat laj & Rural Development, Secretarial, Hyder rbad,
Panchayat RQj & I ural Development, Himayathnagar, I yderabad.
,a'
i I :
l) rr-
t/,
\i
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the lnterim Order dated j711212018 passed by the learned
t{ t
<- lb
Single Judgein lA No 1 of 2017 in W P No 39928 of 2017 on the file of the Honble High Courtof Telangrna and AP at Hyderabad 'pending disposalof the main Writ Appeal
Counsel forRespon<ent No. 1: PRABHAKAR CHIKKUDU
Counsel forRespon<ent Nos. 16 to 18 &22:GP FORPANCHAYATRAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT
The Court made theollowing: COMMON JUDGMENT
THE HON'B LE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA AND THE HoN'BLE SRi JUSTICE A. RAJAS REDDY
WRIT APPEAL Nos.24 3,24a 381 382 & 393 of 2OL9
COMMON JUDGMENT: ii-tI it.. lja.t-t)i. tttc L./r./../ustrce Sarr.sh C handra Shcirna)
ir-r all these writ appeals, interim orders passed by the learned Single Judge are under challenge by which the 1earned Single Judge has granted minimum of the pay scale to the employees working on daily wages. The State Government has also granted minimum of the pay scare to the daiiy wage workers and the main writ petitions are still pending before the learned Single Judge.
Therefore, the writ appeais stand disposed of with a liberty to the panies to argue ali the points before the learned Single Judge.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/-C.V.MALLIKARJUNA VARMA DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// @
\
SECTION OFFICER
To,
b. Two CD Copies 7. One Spare copy
MBC
"\
HIGH COURT
DATED:1911'112021
,i 5 T.ATE o
l/-+
a-
) _).
c)
l) tl Bts?t',s
ir
COMMON JUDGMENT
WA NOS: 243,248,381,382& 393 OF 2019
DISPOSING OF THEWRIT APPEALS
WITHOUT COSTS
),D)4
The Mandal Praja parishad Development Officer, Varni Mandal
G. Hanuma Goud
D. Uppalaiah
D. Venkatnarasaiah
E. Pratap
B. Bicha
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
