The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition challenging the conversion of Kothur Gram Panchayat to Municipality and the election notification as withdrawn by the petitioner without costs.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISHCHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO:1 1588 oF 2021
Between:
Kondareddv Vishnumurthv. S/o. KondareddyYellaiah, Aged about 46 years, Occ: AgricJlture, R/o. H.Nb.4-32,KothurVilfage and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.
...PETITIONER
AND
s. ine oistiiii C6itector,Ranga Reddy DistrictAt Lakdikapul,Hyderabad'. . ... 6. Kothur Municipality,Rep.by its commissioner, Kothur Mandal and Munrclpalrly, R.R. District, TelanganaState.
,..RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 oflhe constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriatewrit, order or direction more particularlyone in the nature of Writ of l\ilandamus,declaring the action of the Respondents in issuing the Act 8 of 2020(which cameinto force on 2gtlol2o2o) to the extent of changing KothurGram Panchayath toKothur Municipalityand also the electionNotification issued for Kothur Municipalityvide NotificationNo.257iTSEC-ULB|2021, Dl. 1510412021 is illegal, arbitrary andin violation of Articles 14,243-E and 243-Q of the constitutionof lndia and consequentlyset aside the same.
ilzil
lA NO: 1 OF 21
Petition under section 151 cPcprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto stay all furtherproceedings of electionnotification issuedfor Kothur Municipalityvide notification No.257ffSEC-ULBs/2021 ,daled1510412021.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. R. NARASIMHA REDDY
Counsel for the RespondentNo.1 : THE ADVOCATEGENERAL FOR GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2& 3: GP MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATIONAND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondent No.4:SRI P. SUDHEERRAO, SC FOR T,S. ELECTION COMMISSION
Counsel for the Respondent No.5: GPFORREVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.6:SRI N. PRAVEEN KUMAR, SC FOR MUNICIPALITIES
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CIIANDRA SIIAR VIA
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. HEKER DY
w.P. o.11588 of2O2L
ORDER: pet ttc Hon'bte th2 ChielJusnce sotish chandru shr.tua)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks
withdrawal of the present writ petition.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, sha-Il stand
closed.
SD/-I.NAGALAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
CHR
;__-
HIGH COURT
DATED:1611112A21
ORDER
W.P.No.11588 of 202'l
1 t^e IG:
,3
or) 0 3 nrfi 2i1,$t
;:)..'
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
V
t<br>bD <br>n<br>(lD
Kondareddv Vishnumurthv
The State of Telangana
Kothur Municipality
Satish Chandra Sharma
A. Rajasheker Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
