In a Criminal Transfer Petition, the single judge permitted the petitioners to withdraw the petition and subsequently dismissed it as withdrawn. The issue involved jurisdictional transfer under CrPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTHDAYOF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHAKANNEGANTI
TRANSFER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 62 OF 2018
Between:
AND
...ACCUSED NO.2
Petition Under Section 407 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Transfer Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to transfer the C.C.No.168 of 2016 which ispending on the file of Hon'ble Judicial First Class Magistrate at Medak, Medak District to the court of Hon'ble XX Metropolitan lvlagistrate, Cyberabad/Rachankonda at Malkajgiri, R.R. District.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section'1 5'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners in C.C.No.168 of 20 16 on the file of learned Judicial First Class Magistrate tt4edak,pending the disposal of Tr.Crl.P.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of crimir ar petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M. V. Hanumantha Rao, , rdvocate for the petitioner and the Assistant pubric prosecutor on behalf of the Re;pondent No.2 and of the Respondent Nos.1 & 3 not appeared either in person or t / Advocate.
The Court made the following: ORDER
rl
,
I
:
)
i
I l
I
i
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA i
iilli
Li
I
Tr. CRIMI NAL PETITION No. 6 t)
' i
ORDER: 1iri iI
il
Sri M.V. Hanumantha Rao, learned fdr, I i
I I I I
petitioners seeks permission of this Court to I iil,t
il;l i't
i ilii
Criminal Petition.
i il
i
I 'il
) Permission accorded. !,i,
ll
ii
,lrl
.) The Transfer Criminal Petition is therefore, SMlS
ORDER:
.) The Transfer Criminal Petition istherefore,
as withdrawn.
SD/.B.SATY AVATHI ASSISTANTREG ISTRAR
//TRUECOPY/
SECTIONOFFICER
To er..."+"::,ftffiiff{#,l#Jpiuqii **::,, i, *: Hvderabad. [OUT] S. Two CDCoPies 6. OneSPare CoPY gbr \ )P--
HIGH COURT
DATED:131121i021
'i 'rle S 1A
(
a ?yl
3 0 D-rfl ''i i i
t,,Jfi-
ORDER
TR.CRL.P.No.ri2 of 201 8
DISMISSINGTHE TR.CRL.P AS WITHDRAWN
),,\
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the transfer petition seeking change of jurisdiction is to be transferred or withdrawn.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
P. Ranganath and Others
P. Prasanna
The State of Telangana
Smt. Penanbadur Mangamma
LALITHA KANNEGANTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
