Transfer Criminal Petition filed under Section 407 Cr.P.C. for transfer of a criminal case was dismissed due to non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear before the court despite multiple listings.
Petition transferred for transfer of a criminal case was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Tr.Crl.P. No. 48 of 2019
Between:
V. Ramanuja Chary, S/o Sri. V. Krishna Murthy, aged about 55 years, Occupation: Proprietor of IVl/s. Adith Electronics, No.7-1-6'1 6/130, Rahmath Complex, I Floor, Ameerpet, Hyderabad-16, Residence of 110/8, Venture-lll, Kalyan Nagar, Yousuf Guda, Hydeerabad-45.
..Petitioner/Complainant
AND
.. Res ponde nUAccused. 2. The State of Telangana, Through PP, High Court at Hyderabad. ...Res pondent
Petition under Section 407 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the [vlemorandum of Grounds of Transfer Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to transfer the case in C.C.No.312 of 2017 on the file of the Honourable XXlll Special Magistrate, Hyderabad at Erramanzil to any other Court in Hyderabad city, in the interest ofjustice.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 407(6) Cr.P.C.praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all fudher proceedings in C.C.No.312 ol 2017 on the file of the XXlll Special Magistrate, Hyderabad at Erramanzilpending the disposal of the above Transfer Criminal l,4iscellaneous Petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, uponperusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Transfer Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 2 and of the Respondent No. 1 not appearing in person or through his counsel and Sri Venkatesham Goturi, Advocate for the Petitioner being notpresent.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON' }LE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI Tr.Crl.P. No.48 of 2019
ORDER:
This transl :r criminal petition is filed to transfer C.C.No.312 of 2Q17 on the 1 le of XXlll Special Magistrate, Hyderabad at Erramanzil, to ar y other Court in Hyderabad.
stand dismissed
SD/. B.SATYAVATHI
\
To,
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY// \t. SECTION OFFICER
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1311t12021
.i,i ? S iATt, o-.
.t
l',t) 3 0 0tnzc?1
.:
ORDER
TRCRLP.No.18 of 2019
DISMlSSING THE TRANSFER CRIMINAL PETITION FOR NON PIIOSECUTION.
o p2</sup>
2 provisions across 1 enactments
V. Ramanuja Chary
Mr. Ravi Kanth Durgam
The State of Telangana
LALITHA KANNEGANTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
