Allowed

K Manasa, Ranga Reddy Dist v. D Hari Prasad, Medak Dist

Telangana HC15 Jun 2021TRCMP/74/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-bench order in a Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition, filed by a wife, allowed the transfer of O.P. No. 43 of 2015 from the Senior Civil Judge, Sangareddy to the Family Court, Ranga Reddy District. The transfer was granted due to the petitioner's residence in Hyderabad.

What did the court decide?

O.P. No. 43 of 2015 was transferred to the Family Judge, Ranga Reddy District.

K Manasa, Ranga Reddy Dist Vs D Hari… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM

¶5

TRANSFER CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PET ITION NO: 74 OF 2017

¶6

Betwee n:

¶7

K. It4anasa, W/o. D. Harr Prasad, Aged 27 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o.Flat No.53, Third Floor, Sri Residency, Snehapuri Cross Road, Nagole, Ranga Reddy District.

¶8

...Petitioner

¶9

AND

¶10

D. Hari Prasad, S/o. late Narsimha Rao, Aged 34 years, Occ: Government Servant, R/o, Plot No.323, Sri Sal Colony, Beeramguda, RC Puram l,4andal, t,4edak District.

¶11

...Respondent

¶12

Petition under Section 24 of the C.P.C. Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to transfer O.P. No.43 of 20'l 5 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Sangareddy, Medak District to any of the Family Courts at Ranga Reddy or Hydreabad.

¶13

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(TRCMPMP. NO: 89 OF 2017)

¶14

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.P. No. 43 of 2015 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Sangareddy, Medak District, including appearance of the petitioner.

¶15

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2017(TRCMPMP. NO: 671 OF 20'17

¶16

Betwee n:

¶17

D. Hari Prasad, S/o. late Narsimha Rao, Aged 34 years, Occ: Government Servant, R/o. Plot No. 323, Sri Sai Colony, Beeramguda, RC Puram Mandal, t,4edak District

¶18

. ... Petitioner/Res pondenURes ponde nt

¶19

AND

¶20

K. I,4anasa, W/o. D. Hari Prasad, Aged 27 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o.Flat No.S3, Third Floor, Sri Residency, Snehapuri Cross Road, Nagole, Ranga Reddy District.

¶21

...RespondenUPetitioner/Petitioner

¶22

Petition under Section^'15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim order granted on 09.O2.2017 in TRCMP No.89 of 2017 in TRCMP No.74 of 2017 as extended on 11.04.2017 as till further orders, and pass order or Orders in

¶23

¶24

the interest of Justice as otheruise lhe^petitioner suffer serious^hardship and irreparable loss.

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s NANDIGAM KRISHNA RAO

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent: M/s N. MANOHAR

¶27

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶28

THE HON'^{BLE SRI JUSTICECIIALLAKODANDA RAM}

¶29

Tr.C.M. P.No.^{74 of 2OL7}

¶30

OR DER:

¶31

This Petition^{was taken out by the petitioner - wife seeking} transfer of O^{P.No. 43 of 20 15 from lhe file of the Senior Civil} Judge's Court^{at Sangareddy, MedakDistrict to any of the Family} Courts at^{Ranga ReddyDistrictor Hyderabad'}

¶32

Heard learned^{counsel for the petitioner'}

¶33

The petitioner^{pleads that she has been residingat} Hyderabad^{with her father and minor children and itis very} difficult for^{her to attend the Court at Sangareddy'}

¶34

Learnedcounseifortherespondent-husbandreportsno

¶35

objection^{for transferof the case'}

¶36

Inthatviewofthematter,theTr'C'M.P.isdisposedofand O.P.No.^{42 of 2Ol5 is directedto be transferredto the lile of the} Family Judge,^{Ranga Reddy Districtat L'B' Nagar'No costs'}

¶37

Miscellaneous Petitions,^{if anY} P^{ending,shali stand closed.}

¶38

Sd/.K'SAILESHI

¶39

//TRUE^COPY//

¶40

ASSISTANTAE}GISTRAR SECTION^OFFICER

¶41

To,

¶42

1. The Senior^{Civil JudgeSangareddy'tvedakDistrict} 2. i'# ;;;;;^{Judseat RansaileodvDistrict at L B Nagar} 3.4 one E'nE CC &^{to i" lr/li H,l,t s Nandigat rtr lr/a"nohar' i'itnn'huo' AdvocatetoPucltdvo^gate [OPUCI} 5 . Two^{CD CoPies} 6. One SPare^CoPY NIt,4K

¶43

HIGH COURT

¶44

DATE D:1 5/06/2021

¶45

fl-s: S 14 r4:
o
)+
1
t-) 0I Jill 2021
I

¶46

ORDER

¶47

TRCMP.No.74 of 2017

¶48

DISPOSING OF THE TRANSFER CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION

¶49

?e>t

K Manasa, Ranga Reddy Dist v. D Hari Prasad, Medak Dist

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K Manasa, Ranga Reddy Dist v. D Hari Prasad, Medak Dist

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maddeboina Laxmi Prasanna Vs Maddeboina Sai Sharath

Smt Swathi Deekonda Vs Sandeep Deekonda

Smt Kolkondhi Rajeshwari , Neeli Rajeshwari Vs Sri Neeli Kiran Kumar

Mr.Abdul Baseer Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Endowments and 4 Others

M/S.United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Smt.Tullibulli Jayamma and 2 Ors.

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.Hyd Vs Amar Chand and Anr.