Dismissed

Smt Kolkondhi Rajeshwari , Neeli Rajeshwari v. Sri Neeli Kiran Kumar

Telangana HC14 Jun 2021TRCMP/23/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court summoned under Sections 24 and 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure was for a transfer of a Family Court case and a stay on proceedings. Counsel stated the cause became infructuous as the matter was settled outside the Court. The Court dismissed the transfer petition and stay petition as infructuous without further order.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of O.P. 1 of 2019 to another Family Court and stay on proceedings in F.O.P. 1 of 2019 were dismissed as infructuous.

Smt Kolkondhi Rajeshwari , Neeli Rajeshwari… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

IVIONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JUNE

¶3

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM

¶6

TR. C M.P NO: 23 OF 2020

¶7

Between:

¶8

Ku ma r, Smt. Kolkondhi Rajeshwari @ Neeli Rajeshwari, W/o. Neeli^Kiran D/o. Sathyanrayana, aged aboul 22^years, Occ. Private Job, R/o'^H.No. EWS-57, Madhuban Colony, Katedan, Rajendranagar l\rlandal, R. R. District.

¶9

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT

¶10

AND

¶11

Sri Neeli Kiran Kumar, S/o' Neeli Krishna, Aged^{about 28 years, Occ. Business,} Rio.H.No. 10-1 4-2073,Seetharam Nagar, Nizamabad^{District, Nizamabad.}

¶12

...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶13

Petition Under Section 24 of lhe C.P.C. Praying that^{in the circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed therewith,^{the High Court maybe pleased to pass an} order withdrawing O.P.No. 1 ol 2019^{from the file of the Hon'ble Family Court} Judge, at Nizamabad, filed by the Respondent^{herein and transfer the same to the} file of the Family Court Judge, Ranga^{Reddy District,at L.B.Nagar'for trial and} disposal along with OPNO. 932 of^2019.

¶14

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶15

Petition under section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the HighCourt maybe pleasedto Stay} all further^proceedings in F.O.P. No.1 of^{2019 on the file of Court Judge,at} Nizamaad,^pending disposal of this transfer^CMP.

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. G.ANANDAM

¶17

Counsel for the Respondent: SHAFATH^{AHMED KHAN}

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

¶20

THE HON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICECHALLAKODANDA RAM}

¶21

Tl1. CMP. No.23^{of 2020}

¶22

ORDEII.:

¶23

It is represented by^{learnedcounsel for petitioner that the} cause in this Tr. CMP.^{has become infructuous,as, the matter is} settled outside^{the Court.}

¶24

Recording the aforesaid^{submission,this Tr'CMP' is}

¶25

dismissed as infructuous.

¶26

Miscellaneous Petitions,^{ifany pending,shallstand}

¶27

dismis sed. There shall^{be no order as to costs.}

¶28

SD/. I. NAGA^LAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Judge,^{Family Court, at Nizamabad'}

¶33

One CC to^{Sri. G. Anandam, AdvocateIOPUCI}

¶34

One CC^{to Sri. Shafath Ahmed Khan, Advocate [OPUC]}

¶35

Two CD^CoPies

¶36

One SPare^CoPY

CDL z 4r--/

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1410612021

ORDER

TRCMP.No.23 of 2020

1 t{e s TA 14:
5c
r.) 2 I JUt! 20e1 c)
*
s Pi',,7c

¶43

DISMISSING THE TR.C.M.P.

¶44

AS INFRUCTUOUS.

¶45

ffy*

¶46

Smt Kolkondhi Rajeshwari , Neeli Rajeshwari v. Sri Neeli Kiran Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Kolkondhi Rajeshwari , Neeli Rajeshwari v. Sri Neeli Kiran Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd. Saleem Vs Talla Sanjeeva Reddy and 5 Others

Mrs. VimalVasantKarwande Vs MohamemdGbouse Khan

M/s Sri Tulasi Industries Vs M/s Sri Sapthagiri Industries

Maddeboina Laxmi Prasanna Vs Maddeboina Sai Sharath

Smt Swathi Deekonda Vs Sandeep Deekonda

Smt. Kankar Rajani, Warangal Dist Vs Kankar Pradeep Reddy, Hyd