Partly allowed

Maddeboina Laxmi Prasanna v. Maddeboina Sai Sharath

Telangana HC14 Jun 2021TRCMP/15/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single bench of the Telangana High Court transferred a Hindu Marriage Oppression Petition from Ranga Reddy District to Suryapet Court and stayed further proceedings in the original matter upon the petitioner's application under Sections 24 and 151 of the C.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of H.M.O.P. No. 64 of 2019 to Senior Civil Judge Court, Suryapet; stay of all further proceedings in the original matter.

Maddeboina Laxmi Prasanna Vs Maddeboina Sai… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

N/ONDAY. THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM

¶6

TRANS. CIVIL MISC.PETITION NO: 1s OF 2020

¶7

Betwee n:

¶8

l\rladdeboina Laxmi Prasanna, W/o. Sai Sharath, Aged about 25 Years, Occ- House Wife, R/o. H.No- 2-7-791215/1 , NTR Colony, Ambedkar Status Lane, Old Fire Station, lt4iryalaguda Road, Suryapet Town and District.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

lvladdeboina Sai Sharath, S/o. Ir/. Ashok, Aged about 26 Years, Occ- Business, R/o. C/o. G. Praveen Kumar, H.No- 9-3-123, Champapet, Mahankali Nagar, Saroor Nagar, R.R. District.

¶12

.,.RESPONDENT

¶13

Petition Under Section 24 of the C.P.C. Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to transfer the H.M. O.P No. 64 of 2019 on the file of Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reddy District at LB Nagar to the court of Senior Civil Judge Court at Suryapet of Nalgonda District,ⁱⁿ the interest of^justice .

¶14

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶15

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to stay all fufther proceedings in H.lV. O.P No. 64 of 2019 on the file of Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reddy District at LB Nagar, pending disposal of the above Tr.C.M.P.

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. V. YADU KRISHNA SAINATH

¶17

Counsel for the Respondent: None appeared

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

¶20

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA TI.AM Tr.CMP. No. l5 of 2020

¶21

0llDr,rr{:

¶22

l)e tiLiuncr'-ri i1L' sccks translcr o1' I l.M.O.t,. No.64 ot' 20 1 9 liorn thc lrantill C'or-rrt, l{anga Reddv Districr. to the- Senior C]ivil Jr-rtlgc's^('ourt. Sun itpet. Nalgonda [)istrict

¶23

ln spitc' o1- service ol- notice, none appears lbr the respondcnt-husband.^'l-herclbre, it shall be presumed that the rcspondcnt is scrved.

¶24

ln view of the above, considering thc f-act that the other matters are pending in the Courts of Suryapet, Nalgonda District, as the petitioner is residing at Suryapet and as she is facing inconvenience to attend the lramily Court, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar, II.M.O.I'.No.64 ol'20i9 is withclrawn from the llle ol'I"amily CoLrrt, [{anga ltcddy District ar L.l]. Nasar, and translerred to the CoLlrt ol'senior Civil .lLrdge, Sr-rr-r,apet, Nalgoncla I ) istr ic t.

¶25

Accorcli rr r.lr, this'l'r.CMP. is al lur,r,cd.

¶26

MisccllaneoLrs applicatiorrs, il- any pendir.rg. shall stand

¶27

closcd. l'hcrc shall be no order as to cos1s.

¶28

//TRUE COPY//

¶29

SD/-K. ONESIM ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Go SECTION OFFICER

¶30

To 1 The Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reddy District at L. B Nagar. 2 The Senior Civil Judge's Court, Suryapet, Nalgonda District. One CC to Sri. V. Yadu Krishna Sainath, Advocate [OPUC] 4 Two CD Copies q One Spare Copy KUL TP x--

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1410612021

ORDER

g SI'AT€
L
a
)JJ 0 2 JUi 20t1
*
4 //
-..r- otsedictlY
-=-'z

¶35

TRCMP.No.15 of 2020

¶36

ALLOWING THE TR.CMP.

¶37

,Xt
,\
0

Maddeboina Laxmi Prasanna v. Maddeboina Sai Sharath

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maddeboina Laxmi Prasanna v. Maddeboina Sai Sharath

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd. Saleem Vs Talla Sanjeeva Reddy and 5 Others

Mrs. VimalVasantKarwande Vs MohamemdGbouse Khan

M/s Sri Tulasi Industries Vs M/s Sri Sapthagiri Industries

Smt Swathi Deekonda Vs Sandeep Deekonda

Smt Kolkondhi Rajeshwari , Neeli Rajeshwari Vs Sri Neeli Kiran Kumar

Smt. Kankar Rajani, Warangal Dist Vs Kankar Pradeep Reddy, Hyd