Allowed

M/s. Metasun Telecom Pvt. Ltd. v. J. Chandra Shekhar

Telangana HC21 Jun 2021TRCMP/12/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed a transfer civil miscellaneous petition seeking to withdraw suit O.S. No.351 of 2019 from Principal Junior Civil Judge to be tried along with O.S. No.279 of 2019 before the Additional District Judge as in the interest of justice.

What did the court decide?

Transferred O.S. No.351 of 2019 from Principal Junior Civil Judge to be tried along with O.S. No.279 of 2019.

M/s. Metasun Telecom Pvt. Ltd. Vs J. Chandra Shekhar — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE H'GH COURT FOR AT HYDHIBIBTE^{OF TELANGANA}

¶2

MOID.IJ_IHE TWENTY FlRsr DAy oF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM

¶5

TRANS . CIVIL M ISC.PE TITION N O: 12 OF 2020

¶6

Between:

¶7

1 lt4/s. [,4etasun Teiecom p"t. LJg, ,rep. qy its tVanaging Director M. Srinivas, S/o. Sekharaiah, aoed ahnut 54 years, ni".'ptt frf". 168, .169, .t 70, N,4ahesh Nagar, Kapra, ECtLI HyderabaO_sdOoOI

¶8

2 lvlan{a Srinivas, S/o. Sekharaiah,. aged about 54 years, Occ. Business. R/o. Plot No. 168, 169, 170, wanesn'Ni6ai xipr", r"clL,'iva.irr6ij_so'otoi"""'

¶9

..,PETITIONERS

¶10

AND

¶11

J Chandra Shekhar, s/o. Venkatadri, president, Sri Venkateshwara werfare Association, Aushapur Viilage, Ghatkesar lrirandar, Medchar-r/arkijgiri DiJi^-

¶12

T.S. Reddy,-Slq T N. Reddy, aged about 67 years, Occ. Business, Rio. H. No.27, Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad'

¶13

3 QIt, M Nq , Laxmi, Wio. M. Narayana, aged about 60 years, Occ. Housewife,

¶14

R/o.H.No.434, LIG B, Dr. A.S. Rao Nagar eolony, Hyder-abad-S00062

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition Under Section 24 of the C.P.C. Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to transfer suit O.S No.351 of 2019 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, R.R. District, L.B. Nagar to the court of Vlll Addl. District Judge, R.R. District L.B. Nagar to be tired along with suit O.S No.279 of 2019.

¶17

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to stay all further proceeding in O.S.No.351 of 2019 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District L.B. Nagar,^pending disposal of the main Tr.CMP.

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M. SIVANANDA KUMAR

¶20

Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

I )

¶23

;

¶24

THE^{HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE CHALLA KODANDARAM}

..:

Tr.C. M.P.^120F2020

ORDER:

This Tr.C.M.P.^{is filed seeking to withdrawO'S'No'351of} 2019 from^{the Courtof Principal Junior civilJudge, RangaReddy} District and^{to transferthe same to the Court of Vlll Additional} District to^{be tried along with} District Judge,^RangaReddY O.S.No.279^{of 2019'}

¶29

Heard learned^{counsel for the petitioners}

¶30

ln spite of service^{of notice, none appearsfor respondent} Nos.1 and 3. Notice^{sentto respondentNo 2 is returned unserved}

¶31

O.S.No.279 of^{2019 is filed for declaration and consequential} injunction with^{respect to the land admeasuring Acs T'10 guntasin} Survey No.14 situated at^{AushapurVillage, GhatkesarMandal,} tr/ledchal-Malkajgiri District,^{whereas, O.S.No.351 of 20'1 9 is filed for} inju nction.

¶32

Plaintiff No.1, who claimed^{to be the Presidentof} Sri Venkateshwara Welfare^{Association,in O.S.No.351of 2019is} defendant No.2 in O.S.No.279^{of 2019' This aspectwas also} pleaded in O.S.No.351 of 2019^{and the survey number is not in} dispute. O.S.No.279 of^{2019 is filed for declarationand} consequential injunction,^{whereas, O.S.No.35'1 of 2019 is filed only} for injunction. ln view^{of the same,in the interestof justice,both the} suits be tried together.

¶33

¶34

Hence, fhe fr.C is allowed and o.s wtthdrawnfrom the "r''' of Principat ,rr,", J,,),trtlont.'r'::r: Reddy Dlshict.ra trrr.' ferred b the Couft of Vlil Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District to be tried along with O.S.No.279 of 2019.

¶35

Consequenfly, miscellaneous applications, if any shall stand closed. No costs.

,TRUE COPY'

o.",'roniPf;ftilltl'J tV/

¶41

SECTION OFFICER

¶42

1 Jlu,i1rcteal^{JunrorCivit Judge,} Ranga Reddy District. z. rhe vll Additionat Di-strict Judge nrXd, iiJjjioi.tri"t. 3. One CC to Sri Arl. Siv; ananda Kumar, eOvocatelOeUCl. 4. Two CD Cooies 5. One Spare boov KVL GJ *--

¶43

HIGH^COURT

¶44

DATED:21^10612021

¶45

e ST.afe
Y\
li ll
o
01 Jutz$tl
L) n.i/
z-(.) /
i DPt 1"1cvr
"!

ORDER

TRCMP.N o.12 oI²⁰²⁰

ALLOWING THE TR,CMP.

Y;r

M/s. Metasun Telecom Pvt. Ltd. v. J. Chandra Shekhar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Metasun Telecom Pvt. Ltd. v. J. Chandra Shekhar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Vemula Parvatalu, Vs Sri. M.Badraiah

M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, Vs M/s v S a Infra Projects Private Limited

The Official Liquidator Vs Sri Suresh Prasad Mishra

B Anjaiah, Ranga Reddy Dist Vs K Satyanarayaa Reddy, Ranga Reddy Dist and Anr.

G.Rajendranath Goud Vs Sri G.Chandranath Goud

Dandu Anjaneyulu and 2 others Vs Kambhampati Krishnaiah and 2 others