Disposed

Dandu Anjaneyulu and 2 others v. Kambhampati Krishnaiah and 2 others

Telangana HC21 Jun 2021CRP/876/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana disposed of a civil revision petition challenging a temporary injunction vacating order. Instead of passing an interim order on the revision, the Court directed the lower court to dispose of the main suit within 12 weeks. No costs were awarded.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate and Special Assistant Agent to Government, Mobile Court Bhadrachalam to dispose of the suit within 12 weeks from the date of receipt of the order; No costs.

Dandu Anjaneyulu and 2 others Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA}

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY, THE TWENTY^{FIRST DAY OFJUNE,} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA^{KODANDA RAM}

¶6

CIVIL REVISION PETITION^{NO: 876} F 2020

¶7

Petition under Article 227 of^{lhe constitutionof lndia, aggrieved by the order} dated.04.11.2015^{passed in l.A.No.28 of 2011in o.S.No.61 ol 2011 on the file of the} Court of the Sub-Divisional^{Magistrateand Special Assistant Agentto Government,} Mobile Court Bhadrachalam.

¶8

Betwee n:

¶9

Dandu Anjaneyulu, S/o.^{VenkateswaraRao' aged 57 years'Occ.Agriculture'}

¶10

Dandu Suresh, S/o. Anianeyulu,^{aged 33 years, Occ. Agriculture.}

¶11

Dandu Shiva Sankar,^{S/o Anjaneyulu, Aged 31 years,Occ. Agjriculture,}

¶12

All are R/o. Gunnepalli Village,^{DammapetaMandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem} District.

¶13

..Petitioners/Petitioners/Plai^ntiffs

¶14

AND

¶15

1 Kambhampati Krishnaiah, S/o.^{not known, aged 59 years,Occ.Agriculture' R/o} Vadagudein Village, Dammaipeta^{Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District'}

¶16

Atturi Mangaiah, S/o. Venkaiah,^{aged 59 years,.Occ. Agriculture, R/e.} . Vadagudeir Village, Dammaipeta-Mandai,^{Bhadradri-Kothagudem District'}

¶17

Dara Narsimha Rao, S/o.^{Muthyalu, aged 49 years,Occ.Agriculture,Fl/o'} Enagudem Colony, Thottipampu^{Panchayat, Dammaipeta Mandal, Bhadradri-} Kothagudem District.

¶18

...Respondents/Respondents/Defendants

¶19

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶20

Petition under section^{151 cPc prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed therewith,^{the High court may be pleasedto post the matterfor} hearing expeditiouslY.

¶21

Counsel for the^{Petitioners:M/s T. PUSHPA RANI}

¶22

Counsel for the^{Respondent Nos.1and 2: NONEAPPEARED}

¶23

Counsel for the^{Respondent No.3: SRt G' RAVI CHANDRA SEKHAR}

¶24

The Court made the^{following:ORDER}

¶25

THE^{HON' BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM} f2^02o c. R.^P.No.a76o

¶26

OR DE^R: st the^{order dated 04'11'2015} This^{Revisionis directed agaln} of 2011^{on the file of the Sub-} in 1.A.^{No' 28 ol2Oll in o'S' No'61} sistant^{Agent to Government'} Divisional^{Magistrate & SpecialAs} Mobile^{Court at Bhadrachalam'} The^{petitionersherein are the plaintiffsin the suit which} was^{{iled througlr their counsei under Order 39 Ruies1 and 2 CPC} for^{perpetual injunction' The presentI'A' was taken out therein for} said granting^{ad-interim injunctiontill disposalof the suit' The} l.A.^{was disposedof vacating trre ex parte temporary injunction} order^{dated 25'03'2011'} ., _^^+:+.i^i.rers as^{well as learned} Heard^{learned counsel for the petitionerse}

¶27

counsel^{for the resPondents'} Having^{retard to the respectivesubmissions and considering} the^{fact that the suit is of 2O 1 finstead of making again an} interlocutory^{order in the Revisionwhich was fiied againstthe} interlocutory^{order' it wouldbe prudent to direct disposaiof the} main^{Revisionitself'}

¶28

Accordinslv'^{the civil **t"l:"} :"':::: "H:t;t ;:,: direction^{to the learned Sub-DivisionalMagt} Assistant^{Agent to Government' Mobile Court at Bhadrachaiamto} dispose^{of the suit within 12 weeksfrom the date of receipt of a} copY^{of this order'No costs'}

¶29

sha1l^{stand ciosed'} if anY Pending, Misceilaneous^Petitions'

¶30

//TRUE^COPY// ^r??3r'^\flo$.'"f5"#q, SECTION^OFFICER

¶31

¶32

To, The sub-Divisionar^{Magistrate and speciar Assistant Agent to Government,Mobile} Court^{Bhadrachalam'} 2. J- One CC^{lo Sri G Ravi Chandr} 4, ;;bCi; Two CD^{CoPiesNV. r} l,'ht3 li:i 33liil'"^l%"'fl '"'r", One^SPareCoPY MMK <sup>jF- gbr

HIGH^COURT

DATED:^21t0612021

ORDER

I \iE STAr€
e
t
o,) 2E JUlll! ?.121 fl
, '.:1orTa .

¶38

CRP.No.876 ot²⁰²⁰

¶39

DISPOSING OF THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶40

vb^b,

Dandu Anjaneyulu and 2 others v. Kambhampati Krishnaiah and 2 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dandu Anjaneyulu and 2 others v. Kambhampati Krishnaiah and 2 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Vemula Parvatalu, Vs Sri. M.Badraiah

M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, Vs M/s v S a Infra Projects Private Limited

The Official Liquidator Vs Sri Suresh Prasad Mishra

B Anjaiah, Ranga Reddy Dist Vs K Satyanarayaa Reddy, Ranga Reddy Dist and Anr.

G.Rajendranath Goud Vs Sri G.Chandranath Goud

M/s. Metasun Telecom Pvt. Ltd. Vs J. Chandra Shekhar