A civil revision petition filed under Article 227, aggrieved against orders involving AP Endowments Tribunal, was dismissed by a single judge as infructuous since the underlying oral appeal had already been disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERAOBAD
IMONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 6512 OF 2012
Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the order Dated 11.06.2012 in lA No.281/2012 in OA No.248l2010 on the file of the AP. Endowments Tribunal, Hyderabad (Old O.A.No.1412006 on the file of DC Hyderabad.
Between:
(Petitioner no 2 is brought on record as LR of the deceased Solepetitioner vide Court Order Dated 21-06-2021 in l.A1 of 2021in CRP(6512OF 2012)
.....PETITIONERS/PETITIONERYRESPONDENT
AND
Sri G.Chandranath Goud, S/o Late SriJaganathGoud Rl/o FlatNo.101 H.No.3-5-'1093/15 Bhagavathula Arcade S.V.ColonyNarayanaguda,Hyderabad.
.-...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/APPLICANT
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section'l 51 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Court maybe pleased to order the Petitioner, G. Srinath Goud to bebrought on record as the sole Petitioner in C.R,P.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2012(CRPMP. NO: 8681 OF2012)
Petition under section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedingspursuant to order dated11-6-2012in lA NO. 281 ol 2012 in OA No. 248 of 2O1O on the file ofAP Endowments Tribunal, Hyderabad (Old OA No. 14 of 2OOG on the file of D.C.Hyderabad)pending disposalof the appeal
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K GOVIND
Counsel for the Respondent:SRI V VENUGOPALA RAO
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON' BLE SRIJUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
C.R.P.No. 6512 of2O12
ORD ER:
Learned counsel or thepetitioner fairly submitsthat this Revision has become infructuousas O.A'No.248 of 2010on the fi1e of the A.P. Endowments Tribunal,Hyderabad itselfwas disposed of.
Recording the said submission, theCivil RevisionPetitionis
dismissed. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if anypending, shallstand closed.
\
To,
SD/. K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// N.'" SECTION OFFICER
HIGHCOURT
DATED:2110612021
ORDER CRP.No.6512of 2012
1$E STA 7€
(
s
19 Jul$'zl !o
(),))
at
t
* D FS
DISMISSINGTHE CIVIL REVISION PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
k
2 provisions across 2 enactments
G. Rajendranath Goud
G. Srinath Goud
Sri G. Chandranath Goud
Challa Kodanda Ram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
