The High Court, on counsel stating that the respondent paid Rs. 1.5 Crores as per a settlement agreement, held that nothing survives for adjudication and disposed of the civil revision petition along with pending applications.
The civil revision petition was disposed of along with any pending applications, as the dispute was settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 785 OF 2019
Petition Under Section 1 1 5 of C.P.C. against the order dated 18-02-2019in EPSR No. 6521 of 2018 on the of the Court of the Judge, Commercial Court - cum- XXIV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court,Hyderabad.
Between:
...Petitioner/ Decree Holder
AND
...RESPONDENTS/ Judgment Debtor
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Order 23 Rule 3 of Cr.P.C.praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Court may be pleasedto record the memorandum of compromise andunderstandingsin C.R.P. No. 785 of 2019, in the interest ofjustice..
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. CHALAKANIVENKAT YADAV
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRIP.VENKANNA
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1, 3 &4 : NONEAPPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
I I
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEFJUSTI CE HIMA KOHLI
ANT)
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
CryIL REVISION PETITION No.785 of 2019
ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Hima Kohli)
petition is disposed ofalong with the pending applications, ifany.
Sd/. M, MANJULA, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
,lL
//TRUE COPY'
SECTION OFFICER
Toi] rhu .lrogu, commercial court - cum- XXIV Additional chief Judge, city civil Court. Hvderabad.
,. il;'ci.io silCiar-axar.rrvENKAT YADAV, Advocate [oPUC]
,/
HIGH COURT
HCJ & BVRJ
DATED:0910212021
ORDER
HE ST,q
t
o(j 1t ttB 2021
.c)
.);.
CRP.No.785 of 2019
DISPOSI(; OF TII}: CIYIL REYISIO\ I'I.]1'ITIo\
6 ><br>
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition remains maintainable when the underlying dispute has been settled by the parties.
Whether the High Court is bound to decide the petition when the parties have reached a monetary settlement.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Ramachandra Gupta and Another
MS Biotech Private Limited and Another
Hima Kohli
B. Vijaysen Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
