Jeengarala Venkat Reddy, Mahabubnagar Dist v. Jeengarala Sathyamma, Mahabubnagar Dist and 6 Others

Telangana HC15 Apr 2021CRP/3195/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana disposed of a Civil Revision Petition Article 227 by closing it. The court noted that the underlying suit had already been dismissed by the lower court, leaving nothing for adjudication in the revision.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Revision Petition is closed with liberty to revive by filing an application.

Jeengarala Venkat Reddy, Mahabubnagar Dist… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FO.R_T]{E STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONi^-

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HoNoURABLE sRr uu5rrce'cnnLLA KoDANDA RAM

¶5

CIVIL R E VISION P ETITI ON NO :31950F 2017

¶6

Petition under Articre 227 0f constitution of rndia, aggrieved by the order dated 1110412017 in rA No.26l2017 in os No.13/2011 0n the fire of the court of the il Additional District Judge, Mahabubnagar.

¶7

Between:

¶8

JEENGARALA VENKAT ,REDDY. S/o.Late.J.Bucha. Reddy, Age 69 yrs, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Janampet viirage, aool[aii,rli;Zi"il"nroubnaoar Districr

¶9

...pETtTtoNER/pEitTtoNERypLAtNTtFF AND

¶10

' *::S9ffi.0;tll"orrA,.w/o.^{Late.J Bar Reddy,Ased about7e yrs, occ:}

¶11

:?,t'i,lt1trJ#:i#ffi,,ffi il$#s*#*,-iy;::"'x::R":,l';.Ji" :^{i/iirt%:'it'r:?t"?deeswarReddv's/o -BainiJi''age 60 vears,R/o Janampet}

¶12

: iiiJ,E'it',YHi'il'fluiffii:fl,r,'J.%i{ijHfli, age 55 vears, R o Janampet 5. Smt. Revathamma. Wto. Venkat {edd}';s;i;'y"ars, occ: House_hotd.

¶13

^{Fl/o. Maddur vilase & rr/a ndi r, trriri.or,t,nl,qlidibtri.t.}

¶14

:mjtsilr+1,,ruig}}nt$,"fvff y?tr*,;ah,Hl'l,,",." hold, R/o.^perkireidu virage, koiik;niirud5|,iJi'rvrhabubnaoar Disrri.r

¶15

...RESpoNDENrs/RESpoNDEirisloEriruonrurs

¶16

For the Petitioner : SRt M.ACHUTA REDDy, Advocate

¶17

For the Respondents :

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

THE HON'BLE SRI^{JUSTICECHALLAKODANDA RAM} CIVI REVTSION PETITI^{ON No.3195 of2017}

¶20

ORDER:

¶21

This Civil Revision Petition^{is filed againstorder dated} ll.O4.2Ol7 passed by the^{learned II AdditionalDistrict Judge,} Mahabubnagar, dismissing^{I.A.No'26 of 2017 in O.S'No'13of} 2011.

¶22

It is to be noted that^{as per the statusreportof District} Courts, Mahabubnagar,^{the said suit itselfcame to be dismissed} b), the Court below vide^{judgmentdated 3 L 10.20 l7'}

¶23

ln those circumstances, nothing survives for adjudicationⁱⁿ this Civil Revision Petition.

¶24

Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is closed. However, it is made clear that if any of the parties desire to be heard, liberty is given to them to file an Application to revive the Revision and on filing such Application, the matter would be heard on rnerits.

¶25

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand

¶26

closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶27

Sd/-K,AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' @ SECTION OFFICER

¶28

To '1. The llAdditional District Judge, Mahabubnagar. 2. One CC to Sri M.Achuta Reddy, Advocate (6pUC) 3. Two CD Copies Kj <sup>j--

HIGH^COURT

DATED:15/04/2021

ORDER

1 .dE sTA 14:
o
( e
d 00MAY2021 o
+.L

¶33

CRP.No.3195 of²⁰¹⁷

¶34

CLOSING THE CRP.

¶35

Jeengarala Venkat Reddy, Mahabubnagar Dist v. Jeengarala Sathyamma, Mahabubnagar Dist and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jeengarala Venkat Reddy, Mahabubnagar Dist v. Jeengarala Sathyamma, Mahabubnagar Dist and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Safia Mahmood Ali, S/O Late Syed Mahmood Ali, Occ. Household Vs Garudapalli Shabarisha, S/O Late G. Ashok Kumar, Occ. Business

M/S Essence Hospitality Vs Roger Hessing

M/S Essence Hospitality and M/S Via Milano Hyderabad Vs Roger Hessing

D. Satyanarayana Raju, S/o.Late D.Narsimha Raju Vs M. Venkat Reddy, S/o M.Surender Reddy,Occu.Business

Andhra Pradesh Housing Board Vs Mrs. Laiq Fatima

Smt.S. Keshava, Vs Smt.K.Parvati Rao