Allowed

Kattamuri Sandeep v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC23 Feb 2021CRLP/931/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an anticipatory bail petition filed in the High Court of Telangana. The petitioner, accused in an FIR regarding matrimonial disputes, sought bail before arrest. The Bench granted interim anticipatory bail, directing surrender within 15 days on a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was granted anticipatory bail on a personal bond of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties for similar amounts, subject to periodic appearance and surrender within 15 days.

Kattamuri Sandeep Vs The State of Telangana — Matrimonial and Divorce | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

[^31s8j

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

:PRESENT:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 931 OF 2021

¶6

Between:

¶7

Kattamuri Sandeep, S/o. KVR Murthy.

¶8

Petitioner/Accused No.1

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Telangana, through S.H.O., Women Police Station, Begumpet, Hyderabad, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad.

¶11

RespondenUComplainant

¶12

Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be^pleased to enlarge the^petitioners herein on bail in the event of their arrest ln connection with FIR No. 119 of 2020 on the file of the Women Police Station, Begumpet, Hyderabad.

¶13

The petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the Petition and the^grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/s GORLA^JALAJA, Advocate for the Petitioner, Asst. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR^{for the Respondent,the} Court made the following.

¶14

ORDER:

¶15

¶16

TI-IE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

¶17

ORDER:

¶18

CRIMINAL PETITION No.931 of 2021

¶19

This Crimirral Petition, under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is filed by the^{petitioner/Al} seeking to^grant anticipatory bail in the event^,rf his arrest in Cr.No.119 of 2020 on the file of Women Police Station, Begumpet, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A IPC and under Sections 3 and 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶20

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/Al , learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondenlstate and^perused the record.

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner/A1 would submit that the petitioner is innocent of the alleged offences as he has not committed any offence as alleged. He further submits that the de-facto complainant used to quarrel with thr: petitioner and.she never shown any interest to look after the welfare of the child and that she used to threaten him and his parents to implicatr: in dowry harassment case. He further submits that the police issued notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C., and even before giving reply to the said notice, police are threatening to arrest the petitioner. He also submits that tre petitioner is a law abiding citizen and he is ready to abide by any cond tion that may be imposed by this Court in the event of his enlargement on anticipatory bail.

¶22

Learned Ass;istant Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail 1.o the petitioner f nd submits that notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C., has already been issued to petitioner.

¶23

:I I

¶24

¶25

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and looking into the nature of allegations leveled against the petitioner and since nolice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C., has already been issued him, without adverting to the merits of the matter, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/41 .

¶26

The Criminal Petition is accordingly allowed and the petitioner/A1 is granted anlicipatory bail subject to the following terms and conditions:

¶27

(1) The petitioner/A1 is directed to surrender before the Station House Officer, Women Police Station, Begumpet, Hyderabad, within a period of 15 days from the date of this order and on such surrender, the said Station House Officer shall release lhe petitioner/Al on bail on his executing a personal bond to the tune of Rs.'15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to his satisfaction.

¶28

(2) On such release, the petitioner/Al shall appear before the lnvestigating Officer on 1"t and 3'd Saturday of every month between 10.00 AIV to 2.00 PN/ till completion of investigation or filing of the charge sheet whichever is earlier.

¶29

(3) The p,elitioner/Al '- shall abide by the other conditions stipulated in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶30

(4) The petitioner/A1 shall not misuse the liberty granted to him.

¶31

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending in this criminal^petition, shall stand closed.

¶32

//TRUE COPY//

¶33

SD/- K'SHYI.ESHI ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR \y

¶34

SECTION OFFICER

¶35

To,

¶36

The V Addl. lVletropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad

¶37

The XV Addl Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad.

¶38

The Station House Officer, Women Police Station, Begumpet, Hyderabad

¶39

One CC to M/s. GORLA JALAJA Advocate [OPUC]

¶40

Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court at Hyderabad (OUT)

¶41

One spare cooy

InvJ

HIGH COURT

GSD,J

DATED:2310212021

ORDER

CRLP.No.931 of 2021

BAIL

/
//, -
ri l-. ,l
\r'<-" tt\tB

Kattamuri Sandeep v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kattamuri Sandeep v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thati Jaya Prakash , Yesunadham Vs State of Telangana

Kalluri Kiran Vs State of Telangana

E.Srinivas Goud Vs The State of Telangana

Mohammed Aadil Ahmed Vs The State of Telangana

Akshya Chandrakanth Kondhalkar and another Vs Union of India

Kamakshi Ranganathan Vs State of Telangana