In a criminal petition seeking anticipatory bail, the High Court of Telangana rejected the prayer due to the gravity of specific allegations involving harassment and mental/physical abuse within a domestic relationship.
Anticipatory bail rejected; petitioner directed to surrender within 15 days for regular bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THESTATEOF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OFAUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRIDEVI
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 532s oF2021
Between:
Sabavath Ravi Kumar, S/o.Sabavath Bichya, Aged about 34 years, Occ.Government Servant,Resident ofH.No.2-26, PeddaThanda, Ghanapur, Mahaboobnagar 09 375, Telangana.
...Petitioner/Accused
AND
The State of Telanqana, represented byits PublicProsecutor,High Court' at Hyderabad, Through Police StationKanchanbagh.
...Respondent
Petition under section 438 of cr.P.cpraying thatin the circumstancesstated in the l/emorandum of Grounds of criminalPetition, the High courtmay be pleased to grant anticipatory bail tothe petitioner/accusedin crime No.56 of 2021 Police station Kanchanbagh, Hyderabad,in the event of his arrest, in the interest of justice.
This Petition coming on forhearing, upon perusingthe Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition andupon hearingthe argumentsof sri. P. Ravi Shanker, Advocate for the Petitioner andthe AssistantPublic Prosecutoron behalfof the Respondent.
The Court made the following:ORDER
THE HONOURABLEJUSTICE G' SRI DIIVI cRl NlIN ALPliTI'l'loN No.5325of202r
ORDER:
This CriminalPetition, underSection438 oi the Code of CriminalProcedure,1973,is filed by the petitioner/acctrsed seeking to grant anticipatorybail in the event of his arrest in Cr'No'56 of 2021 on theflle of Kanchanbagh Police Station,Hyderabad, registeredfor the offencesunder Sections 4g3, 417' 420' 498- A and 5 06 of l'P'C'
against him are allfalse,baseless and invonted for ths purpose of implicating thepetitionerand to extract money from hirn' He further submits thatpetitioner is innocent of the alleged offences and he has been falselyimplicated in the present crirne. He also submitsthat the petitioner is a law abidingcitizenand ready to abide by any condition thatrnaybeinrposedbythisCourtintheeventofhiserrlargetnenton anticipatorybail.
5.LearnedAssistantPublicProsecutorvehenrentlyopposedto grant anticipatory bailto the petitioner.
petition, shall stand disrnissed.
SD/. I. NAGALAKSHMI ASSISTANTREGISTRAR 60 //TRUE coPY// sEcrloNoFFlcER
1
<br>
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1610812021
ORDER
CRLP.No.5325 of 2021
1 l.t
,1 ( <br>?
J
a)i) 2 4 AUG2ul t.j:l
-L
."c
1.
?'o
Dp3.l.
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION
<br>t
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner accused in a domestic dispute involving alleged cheating and harassment.
Whether the specific allegations and gravity of the offences warrant denial of anticipatory bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sabavath Ravi Kumar
The State of Telangana
G. Sri Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
