Disposed

Smt.Anumula Sangeetha v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC16 Aug 2021CRLP/4836/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking dispensation from personal appearance in a Domestic Violence case, the Court dispensed with the presence of petitioners except on dates specifically required, as their identity was not in dispute, and disposed of the petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Dispensation with personal appearance of petitioners in DVC No. 7 of 2021, except when specifically required; petitions disposed of.

Smt.Anumula Sangeetha Vs The State of Telangana — Domestic Violence | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

AT HYDERABAD -

¶3

MONDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

¶6

RIMINAL PETITION NO: 4836 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

Smt.Anumu!. pglOe^et1^a,^-!!/q I Ramesh, Aged about 38 years, Occ. Housewife R/o.H.No.8-43/23lA/A, Srinivasa coroiy, Uppar, MedctiJr-tM;rkaism District.

¶9

2 |lrTylg R/o H.No.8-43/23lA/A, Srinivasa Colony, Uppal,^{Ramesh, S/o.A.Upendal, Aged about 42} Me'dchat-fr,,lattaisiribisi;i;i:^{yearc, Occ. private} Emptoyee^"'--

¶10

3 Smt.Eggat . Sjrrala, W/o. E.Kiran - kumar, Aged about at years,' Occ HousewifeR/o.Flat No.201, S.hruti Grand Apart-ment, Gayathri (;g"i Oi;. Viletha Supermarket Lane, P.f,4.palem, Visakhipatnam, Andhra pradeih.^--

¶11

4 !O9adi^{Kiran Kumar, S/o E.BhaskarAged 'about 40 years, -OiL private} Employee R/o.Flat No.201, Shruti GranI Apartment, G6yathrr trlaqar. Ooo. viretha supermarket Lane, P M parem, y:igi,lia,l?Hsxgkslr"^::. .,"I

¶12

AND

¶13

1 The state of relangana, Rep.by its public prosecutor, High court for the state of I elangana, Hyderabad.

¶14

¶15

Smt.Elu.gam. Swathi @Achukatla :Swath!, W/o.E.Sathya prasad Aged about 30 years, Occ. Nature Cure Doctor, RIo.H.No.s-S-j14146l)l Chaitan"ya Colony, Banswada Town and Mandal, Kamareddv District

¶16

3 Baby Elugam .Raghasree, D/o- E.Sathya'prasad, Aged about 5 1/2 years, Minor, under the natural Guardianship of smt.Erugam Swathi @ ncrrufuttl-Swii-ni, W/9rE:S_alhy^q^{Prasad,_agedabout30 yeaE, Occ. Hou#wife,-Fy;.H.M-asl} 1 1 4 t 46tD1, chaitanya corony, Banswada row:..AE#A]$S!fi?T,flE+r#,BliE,fit

¶17

Petition under Section 482 ol cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to call for records in DVC.No.7 of 2021 on the file of Judicial First class Magistrate at Banswada and consequently quash the same.

¶18

l.A. NO: 2OF 2021

¶19

Petition under section 482 of cr.p .c praying that an the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings, including appearance of the petitione rs/respo ndent Nos.4 to 7 in DVC.No.7 of 2021 on the fire of Judiciar First class Magistrate at Banswada, pending disposal of the above criminal petition.

¶20

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of tM/s. pILLIX LAW FIRM, Advocate for the Petitioners and the public prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3.

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

¶23

CRTMTNAL PETTTTON NO.4836 OF 202!

¶24

ORDEBT

¶25

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 4g2 of the Code of Criminal Prodedure seeking quashing of the llroceedings in D.V.C.No.7 of 2OLl on the file of the Judicial First C:ass Magistrate at Banswada.

¶26

A charge sheet came to be filed against the petitioners/A-4 to A-7 lbr the ofl'ence punishable under Section i2(1) of the Protection of Wornerr lir:m Domestic Violence Act, :1005 and Rule 6( I ) of the Protection of Women from Domestic .iolerrce l?ules, 2OO(t

¶27

Though the pr.esent Criminal petition is filecl seel<ing quasliing oi entire proceedings, but learned counsel for the petitioners/A-4 to A-T restricts his prayer seeking ciispensation of the presence of the petitioners/A-4 to A-7 before the trial conrt on every date of adjournment.

¶28

The learned Public prosecutor submits tlLat since the identit-v of petitioners /A-4 fo A-7 is not in dispute, their presence in the above case lray not be necessary on :very dale of adjou rnmen t.

¶29

Having regar<l to the facts arrd circumstances cf the case, the personal appearan{: r-rf the petitioners/A-.+ to A-7 ir; c6nls111g6 .n D.V.C.No.7 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial l.irst Cl,lss t,lagisrratr at Banswada, is hereby dispensed with except on the dates when their presence is specilir:ally required by the Court.

¶30

¶31

With the above direction, the Criminerl Petition is disposcrci of

¶32

insofar as the petitioners/A-4 to A-7 are concerned,

¶33

Miscellaneous applications, if any, pe nding shall stand

¶34

closed.

¶35

//TRUE COPY'

¶36

SD/.N.CHANDRASEKAR^RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Y-"

¶37

SECTION OFFICER

¶38

To,

¶39

The Judicial First Class Magistrate^{at Banswada' Nizamabad District'}

¶40

Two CCs to Public^{Prosecuior,HighCourt for the State of Telanganaat} Hvderabad.^(OUT)

¶41

Ohe CC to M/s. Pillix Law^{Firm, Advocate} [OPUCI

¶42

Two CD Copies

¶43

On Spare Copy KUL

gbr

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1610812021

u S IAI€
rt "-<br>(
iss stP?szf i
+l*-
;
\A n-^r,r.lt'
-'rS.:-,;t

¶48

ORDER

¶49

CRLP.No.4836 ot 2021

¶50

DISPOSING OF THE CRL.PETITION

¶51

Smt.Anumula Sangeetha v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt.Anumula Sangeetha v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dasari Murali and Another Vs The State of Telangana and Another

V.V. Naga Harish Vs G. Priyanka

Chepyala Janardhan Reddy and 5 others Vs The State of Telangana and another

Pasala Jaya Vs The State of Telangana

Manne Raghavendra Vs The State of Telangana

Sabavath Ravi Kumar Vs The State of Telangana