Dismissed

V.V. Naga Harish v. G. Priyanka

Telangana HC13 Aug 2021CRLP/2658/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for quashing of criminal proceedings. The Court found the petition infructuous as the cause did not survive for further adjudication. Pending applications were also dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous and all pending miscellaneous applications are dismissed.

V.V. Naga Harish Vs G. Priyanka — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA^{AT HYDERABAD}

¶2

FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST

¶3

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2658 OF 2020

¶7

Between:

¶8

V.V. Naga Harish, S/o. V. Krishna^{Kishore,aged about 30} . -^years' R/o. H.Nds - 2 - l$otP-16, Sri Lakshmi^{Nilayam, SubhapradraTownship, Kusuma} Nagar, Vanasthalipuram. R^{R -500070}

¶9

.....PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶10

AND

¶11

G. Priyanka, D/o. G. Lakshmi^{Narayana,aged} . .about,^28years, R/o. H. No. 2 - 2 - 1055t60, Bathukamma^{Kunta,Amberpet, Hyderabad'}

¶12

The State of Telangana, Rep. by^{its Public Prosecutor. High court of Telangana} at Hyderabad.

¶13

.....RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT

¶14

Petition under section 482 of^{cr.P.c praying thatin the circumstancesstated} in the Memorandum of Grounds of^{criminal Petition, the High courtmay be pleased} to quash all further^{proceedingsin crimeNo. 330 of 2019 of AmberpetPolice} Station, Hyderabad.

¶15

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2020

¶16

Petition under section^{482 ol cr.P.cpraying that in the circumstancesstated} in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of^{Criminal Petition, the High Courtmaybe pleased} to stay all further^{proceedingsin in crime No. 330 of 2019 of AmberpetPolice} Station, Hyderabad.^{pending disposalof the above Criminalpetition}

¶17

This Petition coming on^{for hearing, upon perusingthe Memorandum of} Grounds of Criminal Petition^{anduponhearingthearguments of} Sri. T. S. Anirudh^{Reddy, Advocatefor the Petitionerand the Assistant Public} Prosecutor on behalf . of the^{RespondentNo.2 and of sri. s. Krishnasharma,} Advocate for the ResPondent^No.1

¶18

The Court made the following:^ORDER

¶19

¶20

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

¶21

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.26^J oF 2020

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respottdent-State would submit that the cause ln this Criminal Petitio n does not survive for further adjudication and the Criminal Petition has become infructuous.

¶24

In that view of the matter, recording the said subreission, the

¶25

Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶26

Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending s.hall stand

¶27

dismissed.

¶28

SD/. B.SATYAVATHI ASSI:iTANT^REGISTRAR ()p

,TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

'1 . The lV Additional Chief Metropolitan^{Magistrate.atHvderabad} 2. The station^{House office"r""ii[h;i.i,"tr";-5iation,Amoe'petHvderabad.}

¶34

5: cj;;"cc i; siil.^{s. Ani,,bh Reddv, Advocate {oP.UCl} ;. il; 6c i;^{s;i. s. Krishna Sharma, Advocate[oPUCl} ;. i;;tt. io iroii" Pi;;;;i;;,'iiish-c;uh^{ror ihe strrte or reransanaat} Hyderabad tOUTI

¶35

Two CD^Copies

¶36

One SPare^CoPY

VM tp $....I

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1310812021

ORDER CRLP.No.2658 ot 2020

¶41

1Y. 6 SrAI€,
e
o-)o 2I AUC2021 c
-,.t t.
. /lt ,/
.oas pA.Tc ,-t5lO

¶42

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS

V.V. Naga Harish v. G. Priyanka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.V. Naga Harish v. G. Priyanka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Medipally Bharath Kumar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

State of Telangana , Rep by the Pp., Vs Meerza Ahmed Baig , Amzad Baig, Kataram (M).

Battikadi Narasimha Goud Vs The State of Telangana

Dasari Murali and Another Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Chepyala Janardhan Reddy and 5 others Vs The State of Telangana and another

Kothagolla Sathaiah Vs The State of Telangana and another