Dismissed

D.Rameswar Rao (A-1) Sec-Bad and 5 Otrs., v. State of Ap., Rep. Pp and Anr.

Telangana HC22 Oct 2021CRLP/5230/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed Criminal Petition No. 5230 of 2014 as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file a fresh petition. Consequently, any interim stay and miscellaneous petitions were vacated or closed.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to file fresh petition; interim stay vacated; miscellaneous petitions closed.

D.Rameswar Rao (A-1) Sec-Bad and 5 Otrs., Vs… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶2

AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5230 OF 2014

¶7

Between:

¶8

'l . D. Rameswar Rao, S/o. late Venkateswar Rao, Aged 65 years, Occ: Business, R/o.H.No.6-'1-20, Walker Town, Secunderabad^- 25.^(A-1 )

¶9

D.Preetham, S/o.D.Rameswar Rao, Aged 39^years, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No.6-1-20, 108, WalkerTown, Padmaraonagar, Secunderabad.^(A-2)

¶10

D.Yogesh, S/o.D.Rameswar Rao, Aged 29^years, Occ:^Business, R/o.H. No.6-1-20, 108, Walker Town, Padmaraonagar, Secunderabad^- 25.^(A-3)

¶11

Smt.D.Aruna Kumari, W/o.late D.Vijay Kumar, Aged 53^{years, Occ:Housewife,} R/o.194, Swarna Plaza, No.7-167, Dharam Karam Road, Ameerpet,^Hyderabad. (A-4)

¶12

D.Vikas, S/o.late D.Vijay Kumar, Aged 30^years, Swarna^Plaza, R/o. Dr.No.7-167, Dharam Karm Road, Ameerpet, Hyderabad.^(A-5)

¶13

D.Akhil, S/o.late D.Vijay Kumar, Aged 23^years, Occ:Student,^{Rl/o.194, Swarna} Plaza, R/o.DR.No.7-167, Dharam Karam Road, Ameerpet,^Hyderabad.

¶14

,..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED

¶15

AND

¶16

1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court^{of AP,} Hvderabad'

¶17

...RE''.NDENT/RES'.NDENT

¶18

2 Smt.Gayatri Tunugntla Ra, W/o.Atmaram, Aged 59^{years, Occ: Housewife,} R/o.791i, Salta Verde Pt, KATY TX77494,^presently Residing^{at H.No.1-10-214,} Boorgu Vihar' Begumpet' secunderabad poNoENT/DEFAcro coMpLATNANT

¶19

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying thatⁱⁿ the circumstances^stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court^may be^pleased to call for the records^pertaining to Crime No.77 of²⁰¹⁴ of^{ChilkalgudaPS.,} Hyderabad District and^quash the same.

¶20

CRLPMP. NO: 4992 OF 2014

¶21

Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances^stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be^pleased to direct stay of all further^proceedings in Crime No. 77 ol 2014 of Chilkalguda Police Station, Hyderabad District,^pending disposal of the criminal^{petition before} th is Hon'ble Court.

¶22

CRLPMP. NO: 76'19 OF 2014

¶23

Between:

¶24

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP, Hyderabad.

¶25

AND1. D. Rameswar Rao, S/o. late Venkateswar Rao, Aged 65 years, Occ: Business, Rt/o.H.No.6-1-20, WalkerTown, Secunderabad^- 25.^(A-1 )

¶26

1. D.Preetham, S/o.D.Rameswar Rao, Aged 39^years, Occ: Business, FVo. H.No.6-1 -20,^'108, Walker Town, Padmaraonagar, Secunderabad^{- 25. (A-2)}

¶27

3 D.Yooesh. S/o.D.Rameswar^{Rao, Aged 2p years' occ,} ,^Business'

¶28

nyo.fti.flo.b-t-20, Watfer Town, Padmaraonagar, Secunderabad - 25' (A-J)

¶29

+. brii.o.n-rr-|.], xl.rii,^{wlo.raie'o Viiavx,mai, Aged 53 vears' occ:} .Housewife ' Rv;.1%, S*arn, praza.^{'NoJ-10i,'bria'am} Karari Road'-Ameerpet' Hyderabad' (A-4)

¶30

S. fil[rt, S/o.late D.Vijay^{Kumar. Aged 30} .^Yegrsl , ^Swarna Plaza' R/o. Dr.No.7-167,^{Dharam Karm Road,Ameerpet'Hydera0a0 (A-5)}

¶31

o. b.lrnir, b1o.rrt"^{b.Vi]uv ki,rii, A-s;,j zg-vedrs. o6c:Student,R/o 194' Swarna} " Fi;);;"h6.Dn.No.Z-r',07, onaram K?ram Road, Ameeroet Hvderabad'

¶32

7 smt.Gayatri runusntla^{Ra, wo.Atmaram,.Ased} ' il".2s1i, Saita vEroe pi, i<nri ix 77494, [resentiy 'd^{,:5'::3IitIJ"J""t'} Residinrl at H.No.1-10-214,^"to BoorguVihar,Begumpet,Secunderabad ...COMpLAtNANT/RESpONDENT

¶33

Petition under Section^{482 ol cr.P.Qpraying that in the circumstancesstated} in the Memorandum^{of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased} to vacate the interim^{stay grantedin Crl.P.No.523Ol2014 on the file of Hon'bleHigh} Court of A.P., Hyderabad^{dated 29.04.2014.}

¶34

CRLMP. N O: 6952 OF²⁰¹⁴

¶35

Between:--"-

¶36

Between:--"-^- Smt.Oavatri Tunuqntla Ra, W/o.Atmaram, Aged 59 years' Occ: Housewife,nyo.z-sli, Salta V6rde Pt,^KATYfX77494, [resenttv^{Residing at H No l-10-214,} Boorgu Vihar, Begumpet, Secunderabad.

¶37

AND

¶38

D. Rameswar Rao, S/o.^late Venkateswar^{Rao,Aged 65 years, Occ: Business,} FVo.H.No.6-1-20, Walker^{Town, Secunderabad- 25.}

¶39

O.pieetnam, STo.D.Rameswar^{Rao, Aged 39years, Occ:.Business,} R/o.H.No.6-i -20, 108,^{Walker Town, Padmaraonagar, Secunderabad.}

¶40

D.Yooesh. S/o.D.Rameswar Rao,^{Aged 29years,Occ: Business,} Fyo.Hi.No.6-1 -20, Walker^{Town, Padmaraonagar, Secunderabad.}

¶41

Smi.O.nruna Kumari,^{W/o.late.D.Vi.iayKumai' Aged 53 years, Occ:Housewife'} R/o.194, Swarna Plaza,^{No.7-162, Dhbram Karam Road, Ameerp-et, Hyderlqad'}

¶42

O.ViXas, S/o.late D.Vijay Kumar,^{Aged 30years, Swarna Plaza,} Fl/o. Dr.irlo.7-167, Dharani Karm^{Road,Ameerpet,Hyderabad.}

¶43

D.Akhil, S/o.late b.Viiay Kumar,^{Aged23 years, Occ:Student, Fyo.194,Swarna} Praza, R/o DR No 7-1'67, Dharam ^.,,i.HEg#l,"flo11,J$ii3ftof., ro u

¶44

7 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.^{by its Public ProsecutorHigh Court of AP,} Hvderabad'

¶45

...RE',.NDENT/RES'.NDENT

¶46

Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C^{praying that in the circumstancesstated} in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal^{Petition, the High Courtmaybe pleased} to vacate the interim order^granted on^{29.O4.2014 in Crl.P.No.5230 of 2014and} dismiss the Crl.P.,

¶47

This Petition coming on for^{hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of} Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon^{hearingthe arguments of Sri T. Nagarjuna} Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner^{and the PublicProsecutoron behalf of the} Respondent No.1 and of Sri B. Chandrasen^{Reddy,Advocate for the Respondent} No. 2.

¶48

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶49

HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE G. RADHA RANI

¶50

CRIMINAL PETITION No.5230 OF 2014

¶51

oRpER (ORAL):

¶52

Sri T. Nagarjuna Reddy, leamed counsel for the petitioner, seeks perrnission of the Court to withdraw the criminal petition and to that effect he has also made an endorsement on the case bundle. The learned counsel seeks liberty to file fresh petition, ifnecessary.

¶53

Perrnission is granted and accordingly the criminal petition is disrnissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh, if so advised.

¶54

As a sequel thereto, interim order/stay, if any, granted by this Court earlier in this criminal petition stand vacated. Further, nriscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal petition stand closed.

¶55

SD/.K.SAILESHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

,TRUE COPY'

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The X Additional Chief^{lr/etropolitan Magistrate at Secunderabad'}

¶60

The station House^{Officer, chilkalgudaPolice Station, Hyderabad District.}

¶61

One CC to Sri^{T. NagarjunaReddy,Advocate} [OPUC]

¶62

One CC to Sri B. Chandrasen^{Reddy,Advocate} [OPUC]

¶63

Two CCs to Public^{Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telanganaat} Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶64

Two CD Copies

¶65

One Spare CoPY CDL gbr

¶66

HIGH COURT

¶67

DATED: 2211012021

¶68

1 {e SrA r€
q
t
d 102 t{fl11f1
-]
* D ,

¶69

ORDER

¶70

CRLP.No.5230 of 20'14

¶71

DISMISSING THE CRIM!NAL PETITION AS WITHDRAWN

¶72

Ir Lr1

D.Rameswar Rao (A-1) Sec-Bad and 5 Otrs., v. State of Ap., Rep. Pp and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Rameswar Rao (A-1) Sec-Bad and 5 Otrs., v. State of Ap., Rep. Pp and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Secunderabad. Vs Abdul Gafoor and 4 Others

Siddipet Muncipal Councel Rep by Commr,Siddipet and 2 Others Vs M/S Balaji Borewell Rep. by Its Proprietor, Siddipet

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd., Vs Shaik Chand Basha and 4 Others

M/S. Kerla Ayurvedic Vidyashala Prop., Dr. M. L.Reddy Vs the State of a.P., and Another

Syed Zulfikar, Hyd and 3 Othrs., Vs Smt. Nusrath Sultana, Hyd and Anr.

The United India Insurance Company Limited, Mancherial Vs Bethi Madhava Reddy and 2 Others