Criminal petitions under sections 482 and 492 of CrPC were dismissed by the High Court as infructuous after the Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioners had been acquitted in the federal case. Pending miscellaneous petitions were also closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR Ar iibr#l:ltTEoF TELANGANA
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY.S rw o rs oi,de ld ii,"r\i,"S,"ro F oc ro B E R
rHE HoNouRor.rt#llt!1,". o.*ooro o
Between:
cRt MI NA LPETITroN NO: 5147 OF 20 14
l. lvuoZutfikar,
! [,x?11fiiT.111t;,
AND
...PETITIONERS
1 Smt. Nusrath Sulatana, Wo. Mohd. Ameeruddin,
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
2 state of A p ' rep' by its pubric prosecutor, High court Buirdings, Hyderabad.
....Respondent
Petition under section 482 of cr.P.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be preased to quash the c.c.No. 420 or 2009 0n the fire of VIr Additionar chief Metroporitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad
CRLPM P.N :48 20F 01
Petition under section 492 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the lVemorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be preased to stay all further proceedings in c.c.No. 420 of 2009 on the file of Vll Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampaily, including appearance of the petitioners/accused.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lvremorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri VENUGopALA RAo PASNOORU, Advocate for the petitioners and of the Additional pubric Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURAE;LEDT. JUSTICE G' RADHA RANI
CRIMINALPETITINNo.51 410F2014
ORDER(ORAL):
LeamedPublicProsecutorwould submitthat the petitioners hereinwereacquitted by the trial Court in the calendar caseon 28.11.2014,as such, cause in this criminalpetition does not survive requiringanyfurther adjudication'
Recordingthe aforesaid submissionof the leamedPublic
Prosecutor, thecriminal petitionis dismissed as infructuous'
As a sequel thereto,miscellaneouspetitions,if any,pending in
this criminalpetitiorstand closed.
Sd/-K.ONESIM
ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
//TRUECOPY//
SIiCTION OFFICER
To
; 1-TheVllAdditionalChiefMetropolitanMagistrate,atHyderabad.+i,u"o Ub;i;'ih;Prbric proiicltor,-Hish 6ourt for the state of relansana' Hvderabad(OUT)
Kj.1./
{
HlGHCOURT
DATEDzZ2I1012021
e STA I€
1
I oo 02N20t1 C) r)
/...
.{../
,,r.d:
!'EsPl1(r
ORDER
GRLP.No.5147 of2014
CLOSED.
2tt lo
2 provisions across 1 enactments
U. Zulfikar
Smt. Nusrath Sulatana
State of Telangana
G Radharamani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
