Allowed

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd., v. Shaik Chand Basha and 4 Others

Telangana HC18 Oct 2021CMA/656/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal 656 of 2010 based on a settlement reached via Lok Adalat on 11.09.2021, permitting the appellant to withdraw the appeal upon deposit of the decretal amount.

What did the court decide?

The appeal stood disposed as withdrawn; appellant permitted to withdraw upon deposit of the decretal amount.

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd., Vs… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE H'GH COURT FOR AT HYDH1BIITE^{OF TELANGANA}

¶2

MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH NAV AE TTN'TZTN-^ rwo rH o u;A iG :l,Hr?,1."r?i 3ilor.^*

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTTCE G.RADHA RAN|

¶5

IVIL MIS CELLANEO S APPE AL o 6 F 2010

¶6

Appeal under Section 30 of W.C. Act, .1g23 against the order/decree tn w c.No.24 of 2008 dated 29.12.2009 on the fire of the court of the commissioner for workmen's compensation and Deputy commissioner of Labour, Mahabubnagar.

¶7

Between:

¶8

Bajaj Allianz General lnsurance company Limited, 608 & 609, 2nd Block, White House, Begumpet, Hyderabad.

¶9

...PET|T|ONERYOpp. Party-2

¶10

AND

¶11

Shaik Chand Basha, S/o Abdut Ghani, Rl/o. AmisthapurViilage, Boothpur Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

¶12

Md. Firoz, S/o. Shaik Chand Pasha, Rl/o. Amisthapur Village, Boothpur Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

¶13

Neha Shafin, D/o. Shaik Chand Pasha, Rt/o. Amisthapur Village, Boothpur Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

¶14

Haisha, D/o. Shaik Chand Pasha, R/o. Amisthapur Village, Boothpur Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

¶15

[//s Palamoor Seeds Private Limited, rep. by V. Sudershan Reddy, Owner of the Tractor/Trailer bearing No. AP-22-F- 7064lAP 221 4675, R/o. 15-1 , Municipal Complex, Mahabubnagar Presently at Boothpur Village and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Gounsel for the Appellant: SRI P. RAJASEKHAR

¶18

Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 & 2: SRI K. RAMA KRISHNA

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5: SRI K. VENKATESH GUPTA

¶20

The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

¶21

HON,BLE^{DT.JUSTICE G.RADHARANI}

¶22

CMA.No.656^OF2010

¶23

JUDGMENT:

¶24

Heard. Perused^{the record'}

¶25

On 11.09.202^{1, the matter was settled before the Lok}

¶26

Adalat and an^{Award was passedby the Lok Adalat'}

¶27

In view of the same,^{the appealis disposedof, in terms of} the Award dated 1l.Og.2o2l,^{passed by the Lok Adalat' The} Registry is directed to annex^{a copy of the Award dated} l1 .O9.2021 to this^{judgment.No costs.}

¶28

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any,^{pending in} this^appeal

¶29

shall stand closed.

¶30

SD/.K.SRINIVASA^RAO JOINT REGISTRAR

,TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

,l . The commissioner for workmen's compensation and Deputy commissioner of Labour, Mahabubnagar.^{(with records)}

¶36

One CC to Sri^{P. Rajasekhar, Advocate} [OPUC]

¶37

One CC to^{Sri K. Rama Krishna, AdvocateIOPUC]}

¶38

One CC to Sri^{K. Venkatesh Gupta, Advocate[OPUC]}

¶39

Two CD CoPies

¶40

One Spare^CoPY

¶41

(Along with a Copy of^{Lok AdalatAward dated11'09'20211}

gbr

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1811012021

JUDGMENT

CMA.No.656 of 2010

DISPOSING OF THE CMA IN TERMS OF LOK ADALAT

¶48

1 t{ E s 14
3 0t tfotllozt
*
t
lcr
)1

sr,^w \'

BEFORE THE LOKADALAT

}

HEI.D AT HYDERABAD

[Orgonized by High Courl Legol Services Commifiee High Court for lhe Stote of Telongono (Through Video Conference mode;

¶54

Under Section l9 of the Legol Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Cenhol Act)l

¶55

CMA No. 656 of 20]0

¶56

(Before the Hon'ble High Court)

¶57

(Against the Order passed in W Employees Compensation and^{f.jlp."Zap-f 2008 on the fite of the Commissionerfor} !dsif!t{ Commissioner of Labour, Mahabubnagar)

¶58

Appellont / Opposite porty No.2 Bojoj All ionz Generol lnsuronce Compony Limited. 608 & 609,2n0 Block, White House. Begumpet, Hyderobod Respondenls Shoik Ch ond Bosho, S/o. Abdul Ghoni, R/o.Anristhopur Villoge, Boothpur Mondol, Mohobubno or Districl 2. N,1d . Firoz, S/o.Shoik Chond posho, R/o Amislhopur Villoge, Boolhpur Mondol, Mohobubno or Dislricl. 3 Neho Shof in, D/o.Shoik Ch ond posho, R/o. Amisthopur Villoge, Boothpur Mondol, Mo ho bubno or Districl 4 Hoisho. D/o. Shoik Ch ond posho, R/o. G^{AL SE8} Amlsthopur Villoge, Booihpur Mondol, Moho bubno or Districl. o .Jx HtoH co RT 5 M/s. Polomoor Seeds Privote Limited Rep. by LOK A V.Sudershon Reddy Owner of ihe t Troctor/Troiler beoring No. AP 22 F 70641 Ap 22 I 4675,R/o.15-1 , Municipot Complex, o1 1 Mohobubnogor, Presently ot Boothpur Mondol, Mohobubnooor District.

¶59

[No.^{of proceedings} of the High Court Legol Services Commiliee:

¶60

OR D ER R OC. No. I 7 20 I HCLSC I 202 t, Doted OB-9 -2021 I

¶61

:: Present ::

¶62

Nome of Choirmon

¶63

: Hon'ble Justice G. Sri Devi,

¶64

Judge, High Courl for the Slote of Telongono.

¶65

Nome of Members

¶66

:(l) Sri S.Surender Reddy, Advocole, High Court for lhe Stote of Telongono.

¶67

(2) Smt.R,Modhovi Lotho, Advocote, High Court for the Stote of Telongono/ Sociol Worker.

¶68

AWARD

¶69

The obove Cose between the porties hoving been ref erred for

¶70

delerminotion 1o the LOK ADALAI ond the porties hoving compromised ihe cose / moiier, the following Aword is possed ln terms of the settlement: z1-iL-?-ool

¶71

I . This CMA orises out of lhe order doled ?$O24OH^{possed in} W.C.No. 24 of 2OOB on the file of ihe Commissioner for Employees Sap,rtq^A

¶72

Compensotion ond &I#t Commissioner of Lobour, Mohobubnogor.

,^UE

I i

The Commissioner^{for EmployeesCompensotioA ond Assislont} Commissioner of Lobour^{Mohobubnogor,hosgronted} compensotion of^{Rs.4,05,561/-(Rupees Eour lokhsfive thousond five} hundred ond sixly one^{only) besidesRs.500^ towordsodvocote} fee os the sufficient court^{fee hos been deposiledby the petitioner'}

¶77

The Appellonl/Respondent^No.2 -^{Bojoj Allionz Generollnsuronce} Compony Limited, represenled^{by Sri Shoik lsmoil -Assistont} Monoger, hos represented^{beforethe virtuolLok Adolot through} online over the link^{provided by the HighCourt Legol Services} Committee, High Court^{for the Stote of Telongono.In view of the} lotest Judgments of the Hon'ble^{SupremeCourt of lndio, New Delhi,} the Appellont/lnsuronce Compony^{intends to withdrow'lhe} oppeol. Accordingly, the Appellont^{is permitted to withdrow.}

¶78

lf the Appellonl/lnsuronce Compony hos not^{depositedeither full or} port of the decreetol omounl, with occruecl interest, il con be deposited, within (60) doys from the dote of receipt of copy of lhis oword.

¶79

Upon such deposit, . Respondents/Appliconts No.l to 4 ore permilted to wiihdrow the bolonce omounl, os per the conditions imposed by the Employees Compensolion ond Assistont Commissioner of Lobour, Mohobubnogor.

¶80

ln view of the obove representotion mode on beholf of the Appellont/lnsuronce Compony, ihe oppeol sionds disposed os wilhdrown.

¶81

7, The porties ore informed thot the court fee, if ony, poid by ony of them sholl be refunded.

¶82

No order os to the costs of the oppeol.

¶83

Authoris d Signatory
Appellont/Opposite Porty No.2/
lnsuronce Com on
.rr,'' -JIq
Choirmon
Member
^M{

¶84

Dote: I 1.9.2021

¶85

1
o
(Se
t 'ft,?:mm
tl
C)t 1

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd., v. Shaik Chand Basha and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd., v. Shaik Chand Basha and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited Vs Smt R. Sandhya

Siddipet Muncipal Councel Rep by Commr,Siddipet and 2 Others Vs M/S Balaji Borewell Rep. by Its Proprietor, Siddipet

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Secunderabad. Vs Abdul Gafoor and 4 Others