The petitioner challenged police summons and alleged harassment under a writ petition. The learned Additional Government Pleader refuted harassment allegations. The High Court closed the petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial OriginalJurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THESIXTEENTHDAYOF MARCH TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTYONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICEK.LAKSHMAN
wRlT PETITIoNNO.48740F 2021
Between:
N. PurushothamRao, S/o Late Venkateswara Rao.Naoumothu' Aged about 58 Yrs' occ.Aoriculture.Rlo HIG-r0'li[iNi;8beCnrtrapuri Co"lonv Khaiaquda'Gachibowli Vrc: L4anikonda(Jaqir),pd pllrjp''rs;J; d'o oistrictGandipet'-K vRansaReddv District. Telangana-500 089 ...PET|T|ONER
...PET|T|ONER
PetitionunderArticle226oflheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe Circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybepleased to issue awrit or order or direction more particularlyin the nature of Writ of Mandamus,declaring the action of the respondentsmoreparticularly R-4in SummoningthePetitionertotheMaheshwaramPoliceStationandmakingrepeated phone calls by threateningand harassing the Petitioner, without registering the crime as illegal,arbitrary and violationof Provisionsof the Criminal Procedure Codeand alsoagainsttheArt.2loftheConstitutionoflndiaandconsequentlydirectthe RespondentNo.4 not to harassthe Petitionerby Summoningthe Petitionerto the Maheshwaramp S and consequentrydirectthe 4th Respondent not to takeany coercivesteps againstthe Petitioner hereinand also issuea direction directingthe 4th Respondentnot to involvein Civil Disputes between the Petitionerand the RespondentNo.5.
Section151 cpcprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in "'"*ffider the affidavitfiled in supportof the petition'the High Court may be pleased to direct the RespondentNo.4 not to harassthe petitionerby Summoningthe Petitioner to the MaheshwaramPolice Station pendingdisposal of the main Writ Petition in the interest ofthe justice
Counselfor the Petitioner:SRI Y' BALAJI counsel forthe Respono"ni tlot' 1 to 4: SRI9'-B'1YMOHAN' ''.'.--NSSISTANT COVENruMENT PLEADER FOR HOME
Counselfor the ResPondent No'5: -
The Courtmade the following:ORDER
I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.4874 of 2O2l
ORDER:
Sri S. Ram Mohan, learned AGP for Home, on instructions, would submit that on the complaint lodged by the husband of the Sth respondent - Mr.C. Gopal Reddy, the Police have registered a case in Crime No.48 of 202 1 against the petitioner herein for the offences under Sections 406 and 12O ol IPC and thev are conducting investigation. The police never harassed the petitioner herein as alleged by him in the writ affidavit.
sha11 stand closed.
'//TRUE COPY//
SD/-K.SAILESHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR K .r'
SECTION bFFICER
To, I One CC to Sri Y. Balaji, Advocate [OPUC] 2 Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [ouT] 3 Two CD Copies. MP
*-
HIGH COURT
DATED:1610312021
ORDER
WP.No.4874 of 2021
I
1 de S TA r€
)
o 27 MAR 2021 c,
*
oil DArcl
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS.
&,t 69 ,61 @
2 provisions across 2 enactments
N. Purushotham Rao
The State of Telangana
Justice K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
