The High Court of Telangana dismissed a Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C, held to be infructuous, after recording counsel's submission that the cause did not survive for further adjudication.
Petitioner's Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2243 OF 2015
Between:
...Petitioner/Accused No.1 and 2/Proposed Accused No.3 and 4
AND
...RespondenUDefacto Complainant
Petition under Section 482 o'f Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the record in connection with the CC. No. 418 of 2014 on the file of Vll Additional Chief Metropolitan fi/agistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad in so far as the petitioners/ accused No. 1 and 2 and quash the same to the extent the petitioners/ accused no.1 and 2.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 201S(CRLPMP. NO: 2461 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioners/ accused No.1 and 2 in CC. No. 41B of 2014 on the file of Vll Additional Chief [Vletropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the l\ilemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Mummaneni Srinivasa Rao, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.l and of the Respondent No.2 not appearing in person or by Advocate,
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI
CRIMINAL PETIT]ON NO.2243 0F 2015
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the cause in this Criminal Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the Criminal Petition has become infructuous.
In that view of the matter, recording the said submission, the
Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand
dismissed.
SD/-B.SATYAVATHI
ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
//TRUECOPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
to',1. ,n" Vll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally' Hyderabad' 2. The Stationno,t" oitit"i'"M;-gh;ip"9P-oliceStation' Hvderabad City' 3. TwoCCs to the P'b'li;';";;;;;t"''"iignco"tfor the State of Telansana at HYderabad [OUT]
MMK gbr
HIGH COURT
DATED:9/0312021
F
{ H TA 14:
(
q
oo 2?. l4An 2021 o7
-l
4
*
D;:
ORDER
CRLP.No.2243 o12015
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETIT!ON AS INFRUCTUOUS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C survives for further adjudication or has become infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ivlohammed Sami and Another
The State of Telangana
G. SRI DEVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
