Mr. Mukesh Kumar Goel v. The Assistant Commissioner (in-Situ) of Central Tax

Telangana HC8 Mar 2021CRLP/1105/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In I.A. No. 1 of 2021 in Crl.P. No. 1105 of 2021, the petitioner sought relaxation of a bail condition requiring weekly appearances before the Assistant Commissioner (IN-SITU). The court modified the condition to require appearance only on the 13th Friday instead of every Friday.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to appear before the Assistant Commissioner on 13th Friday instead of every Friday.

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Goel Vs The Assistant… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

[.Is8 I

¶2

HIGH COTIRT FOR THE STATE OF'I'ELAN(;ANA AT I,IYDERABAD

¶3

TIIURSDAY. THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST

¶4

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE ,..

¶5

:PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON'BLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI --

¶7

IA No. I OF 2021^/' IN CRLPNO: ll05OF202l /

¶8

Between:

¶9

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Goel, S/o. Rai Kumar Goel,

¶10

...Petitioner/Accused No. I (Petitioner in CRLP.No. I I 05 OF' 2021 on the frle of High Court)

¶11

AND

¶12

The Assistant Commissioner (lN-SITU) of Central Tax, Anti-Evasion Section, Rangareddy CGST Commissionerate, Hyderabad, Posnett Bhavan, Tilak Road. Hyderabad - 500 001.

¶13

...Respondent'Conrplainurrt

¶14

(Respondents in-do-)

¶15

Pctition under Section 482 of Clr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds liled in support of the petition. the High Court may be pleased to relax the condition imposed by this Hon'ble Court while allowing the Criminal Petition vide CRLP No. I 105 ol' 2021. i.e.; Assistant Commissionei iln-situ.1 of Central Tax, Anti Evasion Section. Ranga lleddl CGST Conrmissionerate, Hyderabad, on every Friday between 12.00 noon to 2.00 P.M. in the interest ofjustice. pending disposal ofCRLP No.l105 ol202l, on the file ofthe High Court.

¶16

cRL.P.NO.l105 0F 2021

¶17

Petition under Sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in HQAE No.03/2021 -RR, dated 0610112021, lodged by the Assistant Commissioner (IN-SITU) of Central Tax, Anti-Evasion Section, Rangareddy .CGS'l' Commissionerate, Hyderabad, pending on the file of the Special Judge for Economic Offences. Nanrpally, Hyderabad. a

¶18

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support tl.rereof and the order of the High Court dated 8.3.2021 made in Crl.P.Ns'1105 of 2021 and upon hearing_the argunents of Sri.Katika Kavinder Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri.B.Narasimht'Sharma, Advocate for Respondent, the court made the following

¶19

OIII)EIt:

¶20

I{eard both sides.

¶21

ln view of the reasons stated in the affidavit liled in support of the application, thc condition imposed b1' this Court vide order dated 08.03.2021 in Crl.P.No.ll05 of 2{)21, directing thc petitioner/Al to appear hefore the Assistant Commissioner (ln-situ) of Central Tax, Anti Evasion Section, Ranga Reddy CGST Commissionerate, Ilyderabad on er,ery Friday betwcen 12.00 Noon. to 2.00 PN{, is hcreby modified directing the pctitioner/Al to appear before the said Assistant Commissioner, on ,3"i Fridal instcatl of even Frida)'. The other conditions shall remain unaltered,

¶22

Accordingll, I.A. is ordered. _-.

¶23

SD/- I. NAGA LAKS}I I ASSI T

//TRLIE COPY//

SECTIO oFFI('EIt

l. The Special Judge for Economic Offences, Criminal Courts, Nampally. Hyderabad

¶28

The Assistant Commissioner (lN-SITU) of Central Tax, Anti-Evasion Section.

¶29

Rangareddy CGST Commissionerate. Hyderabad, Posnett Bhavan. Tilak Road. Hyderabad - 500 001.

¶30

Two CCs to the Special Public Prosecutor. High Court at Hyderabad (OUT)

¶31

One CC to Sri.Katika Ravinder Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]

¶32

-5.^{One sparecopy}

HIGH COURT

(;SD..I

DATED: 05.08.2021

l.A.No.l oF 2021 IN

cRL.P.NO.l r05^()F 2021

¶38

TE
!,<br>,$
=s
\

¶39

DIITEC'tION

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Goel v. The Assistant Commissioner (in-Situ) of Central Tax

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Goel v. The Assistant Commissioner (in-Situ) of Central Tax

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhamidipati Bhaskara Lakshmi, Hyd Vs Jala Srinivas Yadav and Another Rep. by P.P.

Bidda Nagaralaxmi , Bharathi Vs The State of Telangana

Shaik Sameenuddin Vs The State of Telartgana

Nalaparaju Rajesh Vs The State of Telangana

Gudur Sandeep Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Ardham Ranjit Reddy Vs The State of Telangana