Somanaboina Kishan v. The State of Telangana and another
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the charge sheet.
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the charge sheet.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 174 oF 2020
Between:
Somanaboina Kishan, S/o Ganesh, Aged about 37 years, Occ: Agriculture, F/o Kakkireni Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Nalgonda District.
...PETITIONERYACCUSED NO.2
AND
...RESPONDENT
...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 482 of cr.P.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminalpetition, the High court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in FIR No.BO of 2019 on the file of Ramannapet police station, Rachakonda, Nalgonda District, against the petitioner herein/A2 and to pass such order or orders as may be deemed as fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioner/ accused No. 2 in FIR No.80 of 2019 on the file of Ramannapet police station, Rachakonda, Nalgonda District, pending disposal of main criminal petition and to pass such order or orders as may be deemed as fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Maha Jabeen Khan, Advocate for the Petitioner and the public prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri G. Bhaskar, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICD K. LAKSHMAN
CRIMINAL PETITION No.1Z4 OF 2O2O
ORDER:
Learned Public Prosecutor on instructions would submit that the Investigating Officer has already completed investigation and filed charge sheet and the same is taken on file vide P.R.C.No. 17 of 2O2O.
In view of the said submission, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Petition, with a liberty to challenge the said charge sheet itself.
Granting liberty as sought for, this Criminal petition is
dismissed as withdrawn.
l{i.:"-11.1.:}:,11!r-ll9_"",pendingif any, shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/.I.NAGA LAKSHMI ASSISTANT B]EGISTRARA---' \
SECTION OFFICER
To,
A
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0810712021
5 T c o
g l\\s8 +
<br>oolu
+
I 0 E Pix
ORDER
CRLP.No.174 ot2020
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS WITHDRAWN
)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the high court should allow the withdrawal of the criminal petition for quashing FIR proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Somanaboina Kishan
The State of Telangana
Somanaboina Sudhakar
K. LAKSHMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court