Dismissed

Smt. Fareena Begum And 5 Others v. The State of Telangan And Another

Telangana HC8 Jul 2021CRLP/141/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. where petitioners sought quashing of FIR. Court permitted withdrawal with liberty to challenge charge sheet and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to challenge charge sheet granted; Criminal Petition dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous petitions closed.

Smt. Fareena Begum And 5 Others Vs The State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

{

¶2

1--* t

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶4

THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 141 OF 2020

¶8

Between:

¶9

1. Smt. Fareena^{Begumw/oMohammad Kareem} aged about⁴⁵ Years,^{occ:Housewife} r/b H.ruo. 3-88,^{Ramannaguda, Chevella} R.R.District.

¶10

1. Mohammed Kareem^{s/o Mohammad Hussain} aged about 49 Years,^{occ: Labourer} r/o H.No. 3-BB,^{Ramannaguda, Chevella} R.R.District.

¶11

1. Mohammed^{Saleems/o Mohammed Kareem} aged about 22 Years,^{occ: Cook} r/o H.tto. 3-88,^{Ramannaguda, Chevella} R.R.District.

¶12

1. Smt. Farzana^{Begumw/o Mohammed Nazeem} aged about 26 Years,^{occ:Housewife} r/o H.No. 10-2U44,MRO^colonY Chevella, R.R.District.

¶13

1. Smt. Rizwana^{Begum d/o Mohammed Kareem} Aged about 21 Years,^{occ:Household} r/o H.No. 3-BB,^{Ramannaguda, Chevella} R.R.District.

¶14

1. Mohammed^{Nazeem(wronglymentionedas} Nadeem) s/o Late^{Mohd' Jameel, agedabout} 30^years, occ:^{Excise Costable,} r/o H,No. 10-21/44,MRO^colony .. Petitioners/Accused

¶15

Chevella, R.R.District. Nos. 2 to 7

¶16

¶17

1. ' The State of Telangana,^{through S.H.O.,} Vikarabad Women^{Police Station,Vikarabad} District, rep. by Public^Prosecutor, High Court, HYderabad.

¶18

1. Smt. Azima Nazmeen^{w/o Mohammed Fareed} Aged 26^years, occ:^{ExciseConstable,} r/o Dadapur village,^{Doma Mandal,} Vikarabad District. ,.Respondents/Complainant

¶19

\ \

¶20

i petition under section 482 of^{cr.p.c.prayingthatin the^circumstancesstated} crimtnat^{petitio-n,the Hishcourt-mavte pleased} \ ,n ,n" ;:#;;i;; i oi"r"o. "r to calt for^{the record's l"lrti.g1" tn" FtR No. io ot 2otg-onthe file of Vikarabad} Wo*"n Police^{Station,VikarabadDistrict'}

¶21

t. NO: 10^{F 2020}

¶22

Petitionundersection4B2ofCr.P.C..prayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the Memorandum^{of crounOt oi C'iminat petition' the High Court maybe, pleased} to^grant stay^{of all trrtn"' pilJ"LAitgtit FIR No To of 201b on the file of Vikarabad} women^{policeStation,virrr"irooiitrict,pendingdisposal of the criminalPetition'}

¶23

ThisPetitioncomingonforhearing,uponperusingtheMemorandumof Grounds of^{Criminal"Petition and upon hearing thearguments of} STi.A.VENKATESWARLU,^{nO"ocatefor the Petitionersand of the PublicProsecutor} on behalf of^{the ResPondentNo 1'}

¶24

The Court made^{the following: ORDER}

¶25

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CRIMINAL PETITIO N No.14l oF 2020

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

Learned Public prosecutor on instructions would submit that the Investigating Officer has already completed investigation and filed charge sheet and the same is taken on file vide C.C.No. 184 of 2020.

¶28

In view of the said submission, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Petition, with a liberty to challenge the said charge sheet itself.

¶29

Granting liberty as sought for, this Criminal^Petitionis dismissed as withdrawn.

¶30

Miscellaneous Petitions,^{pendingif any, sha1l stand closed'}

¶31

Sd/.K,A[/I,IAJI ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// N,/

¶32

SECTION^OFFICER

¶33

To 1 The Station^{House Officer, Vikarabad Wqmen Police Station' Vikarabad District'} 2 i;;'Cc; i; ii;Fuori"^{p'dtliuior,r-righ court for the State of relansana'} Hvderabad^(OUT)

¶34

J ij'":"#T; i;^{i.ient<ateswarlu,Advocate(oPUC)} 4. Two CD^CoPies

¶35

One SPare^CoPY Kj

HIGH COURT

DATED:08/07/2021

5rA T €
1
o
:) .L
22 J]trs$
o
I
I
OESPAl

¶40

ORDER

¶41

CRLP.No.141 ol 2020

¶42

DISMISSING THE CRL.P. AS WITHDRAWN.

¶43

Krsg

Smt. Fareena Begum And 5 Others v. The State of Telangan And Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Fareena Begum And 5 Others v. The State of Telangan And Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P. Manmada Rao Vs The Public Prosecutor (Telangana) and Another

Jangili Venkateshwarlu Vs The State of Telangana

Kathula Roshaiah Vs The State of Telangana and another

Somanaboina Kishan Vs The State of Telangana and another

Dharavath Basha Vs The State of Telangana through S.H.O.,Zaffergadh Police Station and another

Rana Pratap Singh Vs The State of Telangana and another