The High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C allowed the petitioner liberty to withdraw the criminal petition to file a fresh one challenging the charge-sheet, dismissing the present petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the criminal petition and file a fresh petition challenging the charge-sheet was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 920 OF 2021
Between:
P. Manmada Rao, S/o. Tirumala Rao, Aged 57 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o. Flat No. 501 , Habsiguda, Street No.8, Hyderabad-500007.
...PETIT|ONER/ACCUSED NO.1
AND
Petition under Section 482 o'f Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may bepleased to quash the impugned FIR in Crime No. 602/2020 of Subedari Police Station, Warangal Commissionerate punrshable under Section 385, 420, 468, 471 r/w 511, 506 of l.P.C against the Petitioner herein orpass
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may bepleased to Stay of all furtherproceedings pursuant tothe Crime No.602/2020 of Subedari Police Station, Warangal Commissionerate against thepetitioner hereinor pass
This Petition coming on for hearing, uponperusing theMemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and uponhearing the arguments of Sri S.LAKSHIVI KANTH, Advocate for the Petitioner and of thePublicProsecutoron behalfof the Respondent No.1 and of Sri V.Surender Rao, Advocatefor the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
CRIMINAL PETITION N .920 0F 2o2L
ORDER:
Sri S.Lakshmi Kanth, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the Police have completed investigation in crime No.602 of 2O2O and l-rled charge-sheet and ttre same was taken on file uide C.C.No. ).32O of 2021.
In the light of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the present criminal petition with a liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the very charge-sheet itself.
Granting liberty as sought, this criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Misceilaneous petitions, pending if any, shall also stand
dismissed.
To
SdAM.MANJULA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR lL-SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPYII
'1. The Vl Additional Judicial First Class I\4agistrate, at Warangal. 2 The S_ration House Officer, SrOeOaip"iivcJ'Si;i#:
to Public Prosecutor, nigh cor.jrt-f;i;J state ot reransana, Hyderabad ' U,jr!a.
Kj
*--
HIGHCOURT
DATED:07/07/2021
S IA Ie:
1 6E
(
zo
L) 22 Jut2sa
it
I
oEs DA'T
ORDER
CRLP.No.920ot 2021
DISMISSING THE CRL.P. AS WITHDRAWN.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant liberty to withdraw the criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C without adjudicating on the merits.
Whether permission to challenge the charge-sheet should be granted in lieu of withdrawal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Manmada Rao
The Public Prosecutor (Telangana)
A. Upender Rao
JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
