In a contempt case alleging wilful disobedience of a Court order to unseal premises, the High Court found that the respondents complied belatedly. The Court dismissed the petition, let them off with a warning, and closed the case.
Petition dismissed; respondents let off with a warning; contempt case closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR Ar iibrf,lBrArEoF TELANGANA
MONDAY, IHE TWEN' rwo rHou;;il l"l xilR+y 3[ Jrr.
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
co NTEMP TCA SEN O:59 10F 2021
(Contempt Case Under Section 10 to 12of Cont,
in Respondent herein W.P No. 8235 of ror, ZO21)wilrrury vioratins, rhe order ",;ffjn"J:In::j"r;:;::Ji;
Betwee n:
*Pd.rlll|t.,!S/o Abdul Sattar, aged about 30 v H,NO 20'4-20t2olR. Punch Gnarra, charminar, r-iva"rrnj!fl!. occ.Business. R/o
AND
...PETITIONER
.. RESPONDENTS
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 1si cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct personal appearance of Respondents No.2 to 5 before this Hon'ble court pending disposal of the main contempt case.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. MIRZA SAFIULLA BAtc
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: G.P. FOR MUNIC|PAL ADMN. & URBAN DEV.
Counsel for the Respondent No. 5: None appeared
The Court made the following: ORDER
i I I I I I I
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICEA.ABHISHEK REDDY
CONTEMPTCASE No.591 of 2021
ORDER:
This ContemptCase is filed alleging wilfuldisobeclienceol the orcler clated01.04.2()21,passedby this Court in W P No 8235 oI 2027By tlre said order dateci01.04.2027,this Court has passedthe follorn"ing orcler:
"ln ttieto of the snme, tlrc officinl respotdertts are directedto r.ntseal the sublcctprenises .fortlnrithHorL''etter,it rs nnde clcor tltLtl t,LlltotLt lttt'ittg titttl t:nlirltnLLlelicettcrt, iltcLtLtiliotttrcrrtttLrtl (()ri(/rial lLly lrtrsttit'5s ttt tlttt sttble,-l lrti'/l/r5r's. 1i ts tlr,'dl'ss lrl tt,tilttt ] titrit tltts ts ottltl ntt tlttent LtrrntLEt'tn(itl it/lr/ is]]/ii(J(' itillttlul ytrt'iLLdtcc to tlLe rigltts of. tlu rLtLttl.l)tiLtl rrspoLtLl!iLL, ltLtitlitt<sup>iLrrIitr 0rrl.'f-s()l /l/rsa-0ufl. "
(r.: i'rslr.rrr'; Krrsirrra Iletltir', tite lealncti St.rntlin! C_oL.r r.lst,1 lrrr i,i 1\1( , ira> statcti tltal thc official lespontlr.:rrts hitr e cor.nplictl l,ilh the ortlel ol this Court, anci therefore, r-rothing remaius tit bc adjr-rdicatecl in tire present contempt case.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the official respondents have complied with the order of this Court belatedly.
This Court, bv orcler datcd 01.04.2021, has directed thc official ros;.r..cie nts tcr ,nseal thc s,blcct prerniscs for.thin,itl.r. Bu t, the of ficial tc.'sfrar.rtle rrts h.r'e t.ke n their o*'r ti.rc arrd har,c not irnplcr.neatecl the s.-riri .reit'r'irr its trc leti.r a.(l spr.it.'r'hc saitl action on thc pi,rrt of thc .lircral .csp.r.tcicnts is l,ghl_, d(tprccatc(i. ll..ci,et., as thc respo.ticirt \Lr ,l ir,rs rcrti.re tl rr.c..triti.n.r apolo1lr. i. tirr: c.u.tcr .iiitia'it lilrtl br hirr- this (.rrrf ls r.t irrcrirre,.i t. t.rkc a scritrus 'ir,*. ()i tric .1att(,r. ro i)r.')cc('(i agai.st tho .iiicial r'esPontle ats r-rr.rcrcr the cuirtulllpt r.,i ('urts
Act, and they are let off vl,ith a warning that the same shoulci rrot bc
rc'pea ter-i again
Having regard to the fact that the order passed by this Court on 01.04.2021has been complied with, the Contempt Case is closed.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stanc.l closed.
There shall be no ord er as to costs.
SD/-M.RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
\
v'
HIGH GOURT
DATED: 2110612021
ORDER
CC.No.591 ot 2021
.<br>t<br>,?
l.?
4 s
w - C
F *l. t-Ltr
do s.l
!- a
sh,
(.
:4^ 'rt
c H
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the official respondents have complied with the earlier order and if the contempt case should be closed.
Noorunnisa
Arvind Kumar
A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
