The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 9472 of 2020 for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear, despite it being listed for dismissal.
No relief granted; writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF NOVEIUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 9472 OF 2020
Betwee n:
Rathlavath Rekya Nayak, S/o. Rathlavath Jethya Age 60 Years, Occupation Agriculture, R/o Jonnalaboguda Village, Peddakothapally lr/andal of Nagarkurnool District.
...PETITIONER
AND
14.Kavali Srinivas, S/o E rrana, Age lVajor, Occupation Councilor of 12"' ward, Santhabajar,NagarkurnoolDistrict,TelanganaState.
...RES'ONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of [Vlandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaringthe action of the respondents in not registering a FIR against the complaint of petitioners dl. 02-03-2020 of the petitioners and threatening the petitioners to stop the cultivation of their land in measuring 1-32 guntas in Sy. No. 3631113 situated at Naaanool, Revenue shivar of Nellikonda Village Nagarkurnool lVandal And District arbitrary, without authorityjurisdiction, high handed and in violation of Articles'14 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to register the complaint dt 02-03-2020lodged by the petitioners
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section'1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession of the petitioners property in Sy,No. 3631113Ac1-32 guntas situated at Naganool, Revenue shivar of Nellikonda Village Nagarkurnool [Vlandal And District depending disposal of the above writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. D.SRISAILAM
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 to 14 : -
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO. 9472 OF 2O2O
ORDER:
Today, even though the writ petition is listed under the caption 'for dismissal', there is no representation for petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous
petitions, if any pending, stand closed.
SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR
ASSISTANT REGI
,TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To 1. One CC to Sri. D.Srisasilam, Advocate [OPUC]
Kj. V
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 611112020
1 H S IA r€i
e
7
o 20 No, 2U20 a
ll
.1 c
ORDER
WP.No.9472 ot 2020
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS.
)p,
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rathlavath Rekya Nayak
State of Telangana
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
