Sri Simranjeet Singh v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special…
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF IVARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO: 2154 OF 2018
Betwee n:
Sri Simranjeet Singh, Sio Surjeet singh, 21 yearc, occ. Pvt Employee, R/o Plot No.405, Sri Sal Baba Ashirvad Sadan, Saraswathi Nagar Colony, Lothukunta, Trimalagiri, Trimulgheery, Hyderabad.
...pErr,oNER
AND
'I . The Union of lndia, IVlinistry of Defence, Rep by its Secretary New Delhi. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Secunderabad Cantonment Board. 3. The Defence Estate Officer, Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Secunderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.2 and 3 in seizing the petitioner's Properties of FIat No.00'1 and 002 bearing No.3-19-69, Sri Sai Ashirvad Sada, situated at Saraswathi Nagar Colony, Lothukunta, Secunderabad-015 without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and violation of respondents of Article 14,21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to release the Properties of Flat No. 00 1 and 002 bearing No. 3-19-69, Sri Sai Ashirvad Sadan, Situated at Sarawarthi Nagar Colony, Lothukunta, Secunderabad-015 in favour of the petitioner
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 2and 3 to release the properties of Flat No. 00'1 and 002 bearing No. 3- 19-69, Sri Sai Ashirvad Sadan, situated at Sarawasthi Nagar Colony, Lothukunta, Secunderabad - 015 in favour of the petitioner pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Hon'ble Court.
Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. MEENA DHINGRA (NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for Respondent No. 1: SRI NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 & 3: SRI K. R. KOTESWARA RAO,
S.C. FOR CANTONMENT
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION No.2154 of 2018
ORDER:
When this writ petition wos listed on 12.02.2020, os there wos no representotion on behqlf of the petitioner, it wos directed to be lisled under the coption "FOR DISMISSAL". On 13.02.2020 ond 20.02.2020, of request of the leqrned counsel for the petitioner, the motter wos odjourned to todoy.
Todoy, though the motter is listed under the coplion"FOR DISMISSAL", when the motter is token up for heqring, leorned counsel for the petitioner is not present ond there is no representotion on beho f of the petiiioner. lt oppeors thot the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the molter.
Accordingly, the wril petltion is dismissed for defoult ond for non-prosecu.iion. No orderqs to costs.
As o sequel, miscelloneous petitions pending, if ony, in this
writ petition sholl stqnd closed
'" i' Bl:EEi:Hfln:fr3[t#]?$]s,iili{P,"%'"'fl ':ii}?'s:t":5lfJn'i(oPuc) +. fwoCD CoPles MBC MPo' o
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0510312020
1t\c TAi5 --\oi
(
.) 2 0 APR 2120 l.)
lJ
{
ORDER
WP.No.2154 of 2018
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR
NON.PROSECUTION, WITHOUT COSTS
.>> ^D
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Simranjeet Singh Surjeet Singh
The Union of India
Chief Executive Officer, Secunderabad Cantonment Board
Defence Estate Officer, Secunderabad Cantonment Board
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court