Disposed
Shankar Vaditya v. Union of India
Telangana HCWP/584/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI W.P.No.584 of 2019…
What the court decided
AI extract
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI W.P.No.584 of 2019…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
W.P.No.584 of 2019
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 2 and 3 contended that the respondents have dropped the erection of retail outlet in the location and hence, the question of considering the case of the petitioner for grant of LPG Distributorship does not arise.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that since the petitioner has invested huge amount in anticipation of granting the LPG Distributorship, he may be given liberty to pursue his remedies.
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioner to pursue his remedies in accordance with law. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________________________ JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
Date: 04.03.2020 rkk
2
Petitioner
Respondents 2 and 3
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court