Writ petition challenging disconnection of electricity supply was closed as the grievance was reportedly resolved pursuant to interim orders passed on 03.12.2013 acknowledged by the petitioner. No costs were awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO: 35054 OF 2013
Between:
(Both are No.1-7-245, Bakaram, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.)
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 o'f the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in interfering with the business activities of the petitioners in workshop Nos.5-4-203 and 5-4-20312, vide service Nos. i) S.No.DZ 011208: USC:100151675 & ii) vide S.No.DZ 013658; USC:109104627, Boats Club, Karbala A,4aidan, Secunderabad, as illegal, void, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 not to disconnect the power supply to the petitioners workshops
WPMP. NO: 43577 OF 2013
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 3 Not to disconnect the power supply to the workshops of the petitioners in their workshop Nos.5-4-203 and 5-4-20312, vide service Nos. i) S.No.DZ 011208; USC:10015'1675 & ii) vide S.No.DZ 013658; USC:109'104627, Boats Club, Karbala IVlaidan, Secunderabad.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. Y. KOTESWAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: SRl. R. VINOD REDDY, SC FOR TSSPDCL
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI D.V.N. ACHARYA
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'IlLIl SRI JUSTICE AIIHINT\ND KL]]'I.rR SH..\Vll-I \'RIT PEl'lI'lO\ \o.3505.1 of 2013
OITDEIT:
When tlre uratter is tal<cn Lrp lbr lrearins.. St rncl ng('oLrnse I appearing fbr the lespondents had infbrmed the Cor"rrl th rt in view ol the interim orders passed bv this Court on 03.12.2013 in \'P\tP.No.43577 ol 2013, the qrievance of the petitioners has been resol. ecl ancl the sril petition can be closed.
Counsel appearing for the petitioners also not disput,rd about the S'TIIIC,
ln vieu' of the above submissions, the writ petiti(,n ir; closed. No
order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, ifany, shall stanc closed.
,TRUE COPY'
Sd/. K P B KAR ASSTST,qNT IST RAR SE:CTl FFICER
To,
1 One CC to S.i Y.(oteswar Rao Advocate [OPUC] One 2.l CC to Sri. R.'rlinod Reddy, SC FOR TSSPDCL IOPUC ] One CC to Sri D.V.N. Acharya Advocate [OPUC] 4 Two CD Copies CHR
$c,,
HIGH COURT'
AKS,J
DATED:0410312020
1 $E STA
o 2 { $R 202[ o;:
,}:
ES i.,...ji /.//
ORDER
W.P.No.35054 o1t 2013
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
q_e..$tuA )"-tF-
G. Sudhakar Raju
G. Krishnam Raju
A.P.C.P.D.C.L.
Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
